The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Digital inequality beyond the digital divide: conceptualizing adverse digital incorporation in the global South
Open accessAbstract
Digital systems are significantly associated with inequality in the global South. That association has traditionally been understood in terms of the digital divide or related terminologies whose core conceptualization is the exclusion of some groups from the benefits of digital systems. However, with the growing breadth and depth of digital engagement in the global South, an exclusion worldview is no longer sufficient. What is also needed is an understanding of how inequalities are created for some groups that are included in digital systems. This paper creates such an understanding, drawing from ideas in the development studies literature on chronic poverty to inductively build a model of a new concept: ‘adverse digital incorporation’, meaning inclusion in a digital system that enables a more-advantaged group to extract disproportionate value from the work or resources of another, less-advantaged group. This new model will enable those involved with digital development to understand why, how and for whom inequality can emerge from the growing use of digital systems in the global South. It creates a systematic framework incorporating the processes, the drivers, and the causes of adverse digital incorporation that will provide detailed new insights. The paper concludes with implications for both digital development researchers and practitioners that derive from the model and its exposure to the broader components of power that shape the inclusionary connection between digital and inequality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
How the machine “thinks”: Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms
Burrell, J. (2016) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951715622512 · Cited by 3,196 · cited 1×
“Digital has also – via machine learning and algorithms – made systemic processes such as decision-making or distribution of value more opaque, but particularly to system users rather than owners (Burrell, 2016).”
BackgroundDigital inequalities and why they matter
Robinson, L., Cotten, S. R., Ono, H., Quan-Haase, A., Mesch, G., Chen, W., Schulz, J., Hale, T. M., & Stern, M. J. (2015) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2015.1012532 · Cited by 1,216 · cited 1×
“(Robinson et al., 2015, p. 274) These digitally excluded 4 billion are unable to access income-generating opportunities, goods and services based on information and communications technologies.”
BackgroundLiang, F., Das, V., Kostyuk, N., & Hussain, M. M. (2018) · Policy & Internet · doi:10.1002/poi3.183 · Cited by 617
Dependence and precarity in the platform economy
Schor, J. B., Attwood-Charles, W., Cansoy, M., Ladegaard, I., & Wengronowitz, R. (2020) · Theory and Society · doi:10.1007/s11186-020-09408-y · Cited by 550 · cited 1×
“It has been shown that the greater the dependency of the worker on the platform, the more willing they are to allow themselves to be exploited (Schor et al., 2020).”
BackgroundBehind the Screen: Content Moderation in the Shadows of Social Media
ROBERTS, S. T. (2019) · Yale University Press · doi:10.2307/j.ctvhrcz0v · Cited by 339 · cited 1×
“This includes the women who su ff er abuse on social media (Vashistha et al., 2019), and the content moderators who su ff er trauma from continual viewing of violent and pornographic images (Roberts, 2019).”
BackgroundCannibalizing the Informal Economy: Frugal Innovation and Economic Inclusion in Africa
Meagher, K. (2018) · The European Journal of Development Research · doi:10.1057/s41287-017-0113-4 · Cited by 175
Digital platforms and institutional voids in developing countries: The case of ride-hailing markets
Heeks, R., Gomez-Morantes, J. E., Graham, M., Howson, K., Mungai, P., Nicholson, B., & Van Belle, J.-P. (2021) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105528 · Cited by 157
Self-citation
Cited by
Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED) Policies in School Context: A Mixed Approach Research
Salha, S., Mousa, A., & Khayat, S. (2024) · Leadership and Policy in Schools · doi:10.1080/15700763.2024.2443675 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Heeks, R.
- Venue
- Information Technology for Development
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2022-07-07
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 688-704
- ISSN
- 0268-1102 (ISSN-L)
- 1554-0170
- OpenAlex
- W4284880397
- Cited by
- 343
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 51.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Digital inequality beyond the digital divide: conceptualizing adverse digital incorporation in the global South. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/02681102.2022.2068492
- The paper
- Heeks, R. (2022). Digital inequality beyond the digital divide: conceptualizing adverse digital incorporation in the global South. Information Technology for Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2022.2068492
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.