Coping flexibility, forward focus and trauma focus in older widows and widowers
Abstract
Coping strategies play a significant role in overall adjustment to bereavement, and recent emphasis has been placed on flexibility in coping versus unilateral strategies that are seemingly beneficial or maladaptive. The Dual Process Model of coping informed the conceptualisation of coping flexibility as the oscillation between ‘trauma focus’ and ‘forward focus’ coping strategies. The primary aim of the present study was to assess whether trauma focus and forward focus coping strategies, and using strategies from both flexibly, would predict grief severity. Trauma focus and forward focus were assessed using the Perceived Ability to Cope with Trauma (PACT) scale, measured cross-sectionally in older widows and widowers. In addition, we modeled symptoms of loneliness, yearning and perceived stress from PACT scale scores. Results showed that greater forward focus and coping flexibility predicted lower grief severity, and also predicted lower yearning, loneliness, and perceived stress. Additionally, length of time that participants were bereaved moderated the relationships of forward focus coping and coping flexibility to grief symptoms, such that having greater forward focused coping and coping flexibility matter the most early in bereavement.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Knowles and O'Connor (2015) found that less restoration-oriented coping and coping flexibility were related to higher complicated grief symptoms.
“Similarly, Knowles and O'Connor (2015) found that less restorationoriented coping and coping flexibility were related to higher CG symptoms”
From Emotion Regulatory Strategies in Complicated Grief: A Systematic Review (2021) · cites this paper as Knowles and O'Connor (2015)
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 34 · Cited by 22
- Authors
- Knowles, L. M., & O'Connor, M.-F.
- Affiliations
- University of Arizona (US)
- Venue
- Bereavement Care
- Publisher
- Cruse Bereavement Care
- Published
- 2015-01-02
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-23
- ISSN
- 0268-2621 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-8279
- OpenAlex
- W1519245364
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 0.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Bereavement Care (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
- Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
- Keywords
- coping flexibility, bereavement, grief severity, loneliness, longing, perceived stress
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review