Cited by 72Patient Satisfaction in HealthcareHealthcare Quality and SatisfactionPatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

What do people with aphasia think about their health care? Factors influencing satisfaction and dissatisfaction

Tomkins, Breanna, Siyambalapitiya, Samantha, Worrall, Linda·2013·Aphasiology

Abstract

Background: Patient experience and satisfaction play an integral role in driving and directing quality improvement in health care. Although there is an increasing body of literature examining patient satisfaction with health care—including that of stroke patients—few studies have sought to capture the views of patients with aphasia. As a result, the experiences and opinions of people with aphasia on this subject remain unheard. In order to evaluate and improve health care for people with aphasia, there is a need to explore their experiences and resulting levels of satisfaction or dissatisfaction with their health care. Aims: This study aimed to explore the factors influencing the satisfaction and dissatisfaction of people with aphasia with regards to their health care. Methods & Procedures: A qualitative, descriptive phenomenological research approach was used. Semi-structured in-depth interviews with 50 participants with aphasia were analysed using qualitative content analysis to identify both categories and themes of health-care satisfaction. Outcomes & Results: Seven categories (areas of care) were identified as influencing participant satisfaction and dissatisfaction: (1) Forming Relationships; (2) Manner and Methods of Service Delivery; (3) Information, Communication and Knowledge; (4) Structure and Relevance of Therapy; (5) Organisational Management; (6) Individual Support; and (7) Positivity and Improvement. In addition, three core themes (described as Information and…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02687038.2013.811211

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous qualitative explorations of the lived experiences of people with aphasia have found that modifications to traditional qualitative interview approaches are required to account for the population's vulnerability and communication difficulties.

    “Previous qualitative explorations of the lived experiences of PwA (Dalemans, Wade, van den Heuvel, & de Witte, 2010;Luck & Rose, 2007;Tomkins, Siyambalpitiya, & Worrall, 2013) have found that modifications to traditional qualitative interview approaches have been required to account for the vulnerability of the population and their communication difficulties.”

    From “Giving yourself some breathing room…”: an exploration of group meditation for people with aphasia (2021) · cites this paper as Tomkins, Siyambalpitiya, & Worrall, 2013

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 38 · Cited by 72

Authors
Tomkins, B., Siyambalapitiya, S., & Worrall, L.
Affiliations
  • Gold Coast Hospital (AU)
  • Griffith University (AU)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Worrall, Linda
Venue
Aphasiology
Published
2013-08
Volume
27
Issue
8
Pages
972-991
ISSN
  • 0268-7038 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5041
OpenAlex
W2165759697
Cited by
72
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2
FWCI
5.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Aphasiology (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare Quality and Satisfaction
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Keywords
aphasia, patient satisfaction, patient dissatisfaction, patient experience, stroke, quality of care, communication with health care providers, dignity and respect, trust and support, service delivery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review