The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A description of the consequences of aphasia on aphasic persons and their relatives and friends, based on the WHO model of chronic diseases
Abstract
The present study aims to describe the consequences of aphasia by analysing the personal accounts of aphasic individuals who have recovered and of a relative or friend. Eighteen subjects were interviewed. The transcriptions of the interviews were analysed using a qualitative methodology. The analysis revealed different dimensions in the experience of aphasia which were classified with reference to the WHO model, i.e. in terms of disabilities, handicaps and coping behaviours. This last dimension was included to cover the reactions that participants reported to various handicaps and disabilities. The results demonstrate that the aphasic participants' language disabilities are the major cause of handicaps; in fact they negatively influence situations involving communication, alter interpersonal relationships, provoke a loss of autonomy, restrict activities and trigger stigmatization. The relatives and friends of aphasic persons also experience handicaps in the realms of communication, interpersonal relationships, responsibilities, and work and leisure activities. Subjects reported that they used various types of behaviour to cope with certain disabilities or handicaps. Most of the coping behaviour adopted by the aphasic participants and relatives/friends alike was associated with means of maintaining communication and relationships, although some behaviour served to stifle communication. Such behaviour is described in detail in this report. The results may further our understanding of the human and social consequences of aphasia, as well as fostering improvements to the therapy provided to persons affected by aphasia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kagan, A. (1998) · Aphasiology · doi:10.1080/02687039808249575 · Cited by 586
Hilari, K., Byng, S., Lamping, D. L., & Smith, S. C. (2003) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.0000081987.46660.ed · Cited by 509
Living with severe aphasia: Tracking social exclusion
Parr, S. (2007) · Aphasiology · doi:10.1080/02687030600798337 · Cited by 344
Communication Partner Training in Aphasia: A Systematic Review
Simmons-Mackie, N., Raymer, A., Armstrong, E., Holland, A., & Cherney, L. R. (2010) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2010.08.026 · Cited by 325
The efficacy of group communication treatment in adults with chronic aphasia
Elman, R. J., & Bernstein-Ellis, E. (1999) · Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/jslhr.4202.411 · Cited by 302
Metadata
- Authors
- Dorze, G. L., & Brassard, C.
- Venue
- Aphasiology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1995-05
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 239-255
- ISSN
- 0268-7038 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5041
- OpenAlex
- W2058147489
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A description of the consequences of aphasia on aphasic persons and their relatives and friends, based on the WHO model of chronic diseases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/02687039508248198
- The paper
- Dorze, G. L., & Brassard, C. (1995). A description of the consequences of aphasia on aphasic persons and their relatives and friends, based on the WHO model of chronic diseases. Aphasiology. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687039508248198
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.