The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On schizophrenic experiences of the neutron or why we should believe in the many-worlds interpretation of quantum theory
Open accessAbstract
This is a philosophical paper in favor of the many‐worlds interpretation (MWI) of quantum theory. The necessity of introducing many worlds is explained by analyzing a neutron interference experiment. The concept of the “measure of existence of a world” is introduced and some difficulties with the issue of probability in the framework of the MWI are resolved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“The only way to introduce ignorance is to apply a 'sleeping pill' trick [3] which leads to a situation in which an observer splits according to the outcome of the measurement without being aware of the outcome.”
From Why the Many-Worlds Interpretation? (2022) · cites this paper as [3]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The justification is very different: we care for all future parallel worlds according to their 'measure of existence' [3, 7] which is proportional to the objective probabilities of the corresponding possible collapsing worlds.”
From Why the Many-Worlds Interpretation? (2022) · cites this paper as [3]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox
Bell, J. S. (1964) · Physics Physique Fizika · doi:10.1103/physicsphysiquefizika.1.195 · Cited by 12,252
Algorithms for quantum computation: discrete logarithms and factoring
Shor, P. W. (2002) · Proceedings 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science · doi:10.1109/sfcs.1994.365700 · Cited by 8,713
A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of "Hidden" Variables. I
Bohm, D. (1952) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.85.166 · Cited by 5,510
Quantum theory, the Church–Turing principle and the universal quantum computer
Deutsch, D. (1985) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1985.0070 · Cited by 4,597
"Relative State" Formulation of Quantum Mechanics
Everett, H. (1957) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.29.454 · Cited by 3,379
Quantum Concepts in Space and Time
Penrose, R., & Isham, C. J. (1986) · Clarendon Press eBooks · Cited by 757
DeWitt, B. S. (1970) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3022331 · Cited by 678
Quantum mechanical interaction-free measurements
Elitzur, A. C., & Vaidman, L. (1993) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/bf00736012 · Cited by 673
Preferred States, Predictability, Classicality and the Environment-Induced Decoherence
Zurek, W. H. (1993) · Progress of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1143/ptp/89.2.281 · Cited by 525 · cited 1×
“An extensive research, led by Zurek (1993), of the role of the environment in the measuring process shows the stability of local events in the causal chain of a human observer.”
BackgroundInterpreting the many worlds interpretation
Albert, D. Z., & Loewer, B. (1988) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/bf00869434 · Cited by 477
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Lockwood M., 1989, Mind, Brain & the Quantum
- Wigner E.P., 1962, The Scientist Speculates, 284
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Decoherence, the measurement problem, and interpretations of quantum mechanics
Schlosshauer, M. (2005) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.76.1267 · Cited by 1,443
Quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself
Frauchiger, D., & Renner, R. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05739-8 · Cited by 333
Everettian rationality: defending Deutsch's approach to probability in the Everett interpretation
Wallace, D. (2003) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics · doi:10.1016/s1355-2198(03)00036-4 · Cited by 250
Quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself
Frauchiger, D., & Renner, R. (2018) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.3929/ethz-b-000293141 · Cited by 241
Wallace, D. (2003) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics · doi:10.1016/s1355-2198(02)00085-0 · Cited by 231
Metadata
- Authors
- Vaidman, L.
- Venue
- International Studies in the Philosophy of Science
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1998-10
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 245-261
- ISSN
- 0269-8595 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-9281
- OpenAlex
- W1973893525
- Semantic Scholar
- 1d5661e907bfab416f6cbef033147f70fdf046fe
- Cited by
- 199
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 2.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Studies in the Philosophy of Science (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
- Keywords
- many-worlds interpretation, quantum mechanics, probability in quantum mechanics, interpretation of quantum mechanics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
