The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tracking neuropsychological recovery following concussion in sport
Abstract
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to illustrate the serial use of computerized neuropsychological screening with ImPACT to monitor recovery in a clinical case series of injured athletes. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Amateur athletes with concussions (n= 30, average age= 16.1, SD= 2.1 years) underwent pre-season testing and three post-concussion evaluations within the following intervals: 1-2 days, 3-7 days (M= 5.2 days) and 1-3 weeks (M= 10.3 days). The study selection criteria increased the probability of including athletes with slow recovery. RESULTS: Repeated measures ANOVAs revealed significant main effects for all five composite scores (verbal memory, visual memory, reaction time, processing speed and total symptoms). In group analyses, performance decrements and symptoms relating to concussion appeared to largely resolve by 5 days post-injury and fully resolve by 10 days. Athletes' scores were examined individually using the reliable change methodology. At 1 day post-injury, 90% had two or more reliable declines in performance or increases in symptom reporting. At 10 days, 37% were still showing two or more reliable changes from pre-season levels. CONCLUSIONS: This study illustrates the importance of analysing individual athletes' test data because group analyses can obscure slow recovery in a substantial minority of athletes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.59.1.12 · Cited by 7,770
Jacobson, N. S., Roberts, L. J., Berns, S. B., & McGlinchey, J. B. (1999) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.67.3.300 · Cited by 853
Field, M., Collins, M. W., Lovell, M. R., & Maroon, J. (2003) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1067/mpd.2003.190 · Cited by 802
Self-citationValidity of ImPACT for measuring processing speed following sports-related concussion
Iverson, G. L., Lovell, M. R., & Collins, M. W. (2005) · Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1081/13803390490918435 · Cited by 278
Self-citationSpeer, D. C., & Greenbaum, P. E. (1995) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.63.6.1044 · Cited by 216
MAASSEN, G. H. (2004) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617704106097 · Cited by 130
Cited by
Mild traumatic brain injury and postconcussive symptoms in children and adolescents
YEATES, K. O. (2010) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617710000986 · Cited by 180
Bauer, R. M., Iverson, G. L., Cernich, A. N., Binder, L. M., Ruff, R. M., & Naugle, R. I. (2012) · The Clinical Neuropsychologist · doi:10.1080/13854046.2012.663001 · Cited by 154
Self-citationPediatric sports-related concussion
Guskiewicz, K. M., & Valovich McLeod, T. C. (2011) · PM&R · doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2010.12.006 · Cited by 113
Brooks, B. L., & Sherman, E. M. S. (2012) · Journal of Child Neurology · doi:10.1177/0883073811430863 · Cited by 41
Self-citationNew Approaches to Assessment and Monitoring of Concussion in Children
Gioia, G. A., Isquith, P. K., Schneider, J. C., & Vaughan, C. G. (2009) · Topics in Language Disorders · doi:10.1097/tld.0b013e3181b5322b · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Iverson, G. L., Brooks, B. L., Collins, M. W., & Lovell, M. R.
- Venue
- Brain Injury
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 245-252
- ISSN
- 0269-9052 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-301X
- OpenAlex
- W2023506299
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 7.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tracking neuropsychological recovery following concussion in sport. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/02699050500487910
- The paper
- Iverson, G. L., Brooks, B. L., Collins, M. W., & Lovell, M. R. (2006). Tracking neuropsychological recovery following concussion in sport. Brain Injury. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699050500487910
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.