Cited by 38Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances

Resting state functional connectivity responses post-mild traumatic brain injury: a systematic review

Morelli, Nathan, Johnson, Nathan F., Kaiser, Kimberly, Andreatta, Richard D., Heebner, Nicholas R., Hoch, Matthew C.·2021·Brain Injury

Abstract

Mild traumatic brain injuries (mTBI) are associated with functional network connectivity alterations throughout recovery. Yet, little is known about the adaptive or maladaptive nature of post-mTBI connectivity and which networks are predisposed to altered function and adaptation. The objective of this review was to determine functional connectivity changes post-mTBI and to determine the adaptive or maladaptive nature of connectivity through direct comparisons of connectivity and behavioral data. Literature was systematically searched and appraised for methodological quality. A total of 16 articles were included for review. There was conflicting evidence of post-mTBI connectivity responses as decreased connectivity was noted in 4 articles, 6 articles reported increased connectivity, 5 reported a mixture of increased and decreased connectivity, while 1 found no differences in connectivity. Supporting evidence for adaptive post-mTBI increases in connectivity were found, particularly in the frontoparietal, cerebellar, and default mode networks. Although initial results are promising, continued longitudinal research that systematically controls for confounding variables and that standardizes methodologies is warranted to adequately understand the neurophysiological recovery trajectory of mTBI.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02699052.2021.1972339

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Effects of mTBI involve brain networks that extend beyond M1.

    “In contrast, effects of mTBI involve brain networks that extend beyond M1 (Morelli et al. 2021), and understanding the neurophysiological changes within these areas is likely to provide important insight into the cognitive effects of injury.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morelli, N., Johnson, N. F., Kaiser, K., Andreatta, R. D., Heebner, N. R., & Hoch, M. C.
Affiliations
  • High Point University (US)
  • University of Kentucky (US)
Corresponding author
Morelli, Nathan
Venue
Brain Injury
Published
2021-09-06
Volume
35
Issue
11
Pages
1326-1337
ISSN
  • 0269-9052 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-301X
OpenAlex
W3198798283
Cited by
38
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Injury (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (1s10od023573-01)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Keywords
mild traumatic brain injury, resting-state functional connectivity, injury recovery, frontoparietal network, cerebellar network, default mode network
MeSH terms
Brain, Brain Concussion, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Nerve Net

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review