CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 503Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchMedical Practices and RehabilitationTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Outcome following traumatic brain injury: a comparison between 2 and 5 years after injury

OLVER, J. H., PONSFORD, J. L., CURRAN, C. A.·1996·Brain Injury
DOI 10.1080/026990596123945
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study examined long-term outcome in traumatically brain-injured individuals following discharge from a comprehensive rehabilitation programme. Of 254 traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients reviewed at 2 years, 103 have been followed up at 5 years using a structured interview format detailing neurological symptoms, mobility, independence in ADL, productivity status, relationship issues, communication and the presence of cognitive, behavioural and emotional changes. Visual difficulties, headache and fatigue were persistent in a significant number of patients. Between 2 and 5 years there was increased independence in personal, domestic and community ADL and the use of transport. Ten more patients had returned to driving. On the other hand there was a slightly higher incidence of cognitive, behavioural and emotional changes reported at 5 years. Thirty-two per cent of those working at 2 years were not employed at 5 years. Many students had also become unemployed. These findings suggest the need for intermittent lifelong intervention following TBI. Systems of rehabilitation need to be adapted to provide this.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/026990596123945

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 503

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
OLVER, J. H., PONSFORD, J. L., & CURRAN, C. A.
ORCID
Venue
Brain Injury
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
1996-01
Volume
10
Issue
11
Pages
841-848
ISSN
  • 0269-9052 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-301X
DOI
10.1080/026990596123945
OpenAlex
W2159682487
Cited by
503
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 43
FWCI
3.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Injury (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Keywords
traumatic brain injury, long-term outcomes, rehabilitation, activities of daily living, return to work, employment, driving, cognitive impairment, vision problems, headache, fatigue, follow-up
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Brain Damage, Chronic, Brain Injuries, Child, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neurologic Examination, Rehabilitation, Vocational, Social Adjustment, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review