Coping with community reintegration after severe brain injury: a description of stresses and coping strategies
Abstract
A basic qualitative approach was used to describe the stresses and coping strategies of 11 adults with severe brain injury during a critical period of reintegrating into a new community. Subjects identified nine problems as stressful. The stresses conform to a theoretical model of community integration, consisting of four factors: social support, independent living, occupation, and a general integration factor. These stresses identified by subjects may be used in the development of a new measure of stress for persons with brain injury. Subjects used eight coping strategies to deal with these stresses. The coping strategies represent a sampling of three major types of coping: problem-focused, perception-focused, and emotion-focused. The findings show that subjects made more use of problem-focused coping strategies than any other type of coping, suggesting that persons with brain injury have awareness of the problems they face and the ability to assert some control over eliminating or managing these problems. The stresses and coping strategies are consistent with existing studies involving persons with brain injury. However, significant differences in some coping strategies reported in this study change how some forms of coping are thought about. The findings delineate the need for professionals to assist persons with brain injury develop more positive, adaptive coping strategies.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The subsequent adjustment process after TBI is stressful as individuals attempt to cope and adapt to changes secondary to the injury.
“the subsequent adjustment process is stressful for the individual as they attempt to cope and adapt to the many changes secondary to the injury (Karlovits & McColl, 1999).”
From Can acceptance and commitment therapy facilitate psychological adjustment after a severe traumatic brain injury? A pilot randomized controlled trial. (2020) · cites this paper as Karlovits & McColl, 1999
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 48 · Cited by 68
- Authors
- Karlovits, M. A. M.
- Affiliations
- Queen's University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Karlovits, Mary Ann McColl, Tracey
- Venue
- Brain Injury
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1999-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 845-861
- ISSN
- 0269-9052 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-301X
- OpenAlex
- W2152383726
- Cited by
- 68
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Brain Injury (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
- Keywords
- severe brain injury, community reintegration, coping strategies, stress, social support, independent living, occupation, problem-focused coping, emotion-focused coping, stress measurement, adaptive coping
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Brain Injuries, Community Health Services, Female, Humans, Male, Ontario, Problem Solving, Rehabilitation Centers, Social Adjustment, Social Support, Stress, Psychological
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review