The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On the generality of the affective Simon effect
Abstract
In affective Simon studies, participants are to select between a positive and negative response on the basis of a nonaffective stimulus feature (i.e., relevant stimulus feature) while ignoring the valence of the presented stimuli (i.e., irrelevant stimulus feature). De Houwer and Eelen (1998) showed that the time to select the correct response is influenced by the match between the valence of the response and the (irrelevant) valence of the stimulus. In the affective Simon studies that have been reported until now, only words were used as stimuli and the relevant stimulus feature was always the grammatical category of the words. We report four experiments in which we examined the generality of the affective Simon effect. Significant affective Simon effects were found when the semantic category, grammatical category, and letter-case of words was relevant, when the semantic category of photographed objects was relevant, and when participants were asked to give nonverbal approach or avoidance responses on the basis of the grammatical category of words. Results also showed that the magnitude of the affective Simon effect depended on the nature of the relevant feature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Reflective and Impulsive Determinants of Social Behavior
Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2004) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_1 · Cited by 3,984
Mogg, K., Bradley, B. P., Field, M., & De Houwer, J. (2003) · Addiction · doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00392.x · Cited by 455
Self-citationPhaf, R. H., Mohr, S. E., Rotteveel, M., & Wicherts, J. M. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00378 · Cited by 326
Rapid approach responses to alcohol cues in heavy drinkers
Field, M., Kiernan, A., Eastwood, B., & Child, R. (2008) · Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2007.06.001 · Cited by 204
Selective processing of cannabis cues in regular cannabis users
Field, M., Eastwood, B., Bradley, B. P., & Mogg, K. (2006) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.03.018 · Cited by 170
Metadata
- Authors
- De Houwer, J., Crombez, G., Baeyens, F., & Hermans, D.
- Venue
- Cognition & Emotion
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2001-03
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 189-206
- ISSN
- 0269-9931 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0600
- OpenAlex
- W4211077689
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the generality of the affective Simon effect. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/02699930125883
- The paper
- De Houwer, J., Crombez, G., Baeyens, F., & Hermans, D. (2001). On the generality of the affective Simon effect. Cognition & Emotion. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930125883
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.