Theory of Mind and conduct problems in children: Deficits in reading the “emotions of the eyes”
Abstract
A significant clinical feature of disorders of antisocial behaviour involves difficulties in social functioning. It has been suggested that deficits in “theory of mind” (ToM) reasoning—the ability to decode others’ emotions and thoughts—may underlie social difficulties in these populations. Success in demonstrating ToM impairment associated with antisocial behaviour and psychopathy in adults and children have been limited. In the current study, parent-reported conduct problems were concurrently measured with performance on an advanced test of ToM developed for children, the Child Eyes Test (Journal of Developmental and Learning Disorders, 5, 47–78). Preadolescent and young adolescent children (n=79) drawn from a community sample were required to identify emotions from photographic stimuli depicting the eye region of the face only. Findings suggested a generalised impairment in ToM in children with conduct problems, as indicated by a significant relationship between poor Eyes Test performance and conduct problems, even when IQ, sex and age were controlled for. The findings are discussed in the context of the amygdala theory of psychopathy, and the neural systems suggested to mediate performance on the Eyes Test.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Young adults diagnosed with conduct disorder (especially with callous-unemotional traits) display poor performance on the RMET and other emotion recognition tasks when compared to the typical population.
“Young adults diagnosed with conduct disorder (especially with callous–unemotional traits) display poor performance on the RMET and other emotion recognition tasks when compared to the typical population (Fairchild, Van Goozen, Calder, Stollery, & Goodyer, 2009; Sharp, 2008).”
From ‘Theory of Mind’ is not Theory of Emotion: a cautionary note on the reading the Mind in the Eyes test (2016) · cites this paper as Sharp, 2008
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 63 · Cited by 101
- Authors
- Sharp, C.
- Affiliations
- Baylor College of Medicine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sharp, Carla
- ORCID
- Sharp, Carla
- Venue
- Cognition and Emotion
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-08
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1149-1158
- ISSN
- 0269-9931 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0600
- OpenAlex
- W2008793698
- Cited by
- 101
- References
- 63
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 3.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cognition & Emotion (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Keywords
- theory of mind, conduct problems, antisocial behavior, psychopathy, amygdala, social cognition, preadolescents, adolescents
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review