Cited by 101Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Theory of Mind and conduct problems in children: Deficits in reading the “emotions of the eyes”

Sharp, Carla·2008·Cognition and Emotion

Abstract

A significant clinical feature of disorders of antisocial behaviour involves difficulties in social functioning. It has been suggested that deficits in “theory of mind” (ToM) reasoning—the ability to decode others’ emotions and thoughts—may underlie social difficulties in these populations. Success in demonstrating ToM impairment associated with antisocial behaviour and psychopathy in adults and children have been limited. In the current study, parent-reported conduct problems were concurrently measured with performance on an advanced test of ToM developed for children, the Child Eyes Test (Journal of Developmental and Learning Disorders, 5, 47–78). Preadolescent and young adolescent children (n=79) drawn from a community sample were required to identify emotions from photographic stimuli depicting the eye region of the face only. Findings suggested a generalised impairment in ToM in children with conduct problems, as indicated by a significant relationship between poor Eyes Test performance and conduct problems, even when IQ, sex and age were controlled for. The findings are discussed in the context of the amygdala theory of psychopathy, and the neural systems suggested to mediate performance on the Eyes Test.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02699930701667586

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Young adults diagnosed with conduct disorder (especially with callous-unemotional traits) display poor performance on the RMET and other emotion recognition tasks when compared to the typical population.

    “Young adults diagnosed with conduct disorder (especially with callous–unemotional traits) display poor performance on the RMET and other emotion recognition tasks when compared to the typical population (Fairchild, Van Goozen, Calder, Stollery, & Goodyer, 2009; Sharp, 2008).”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 63 · Cited by 101

Authors
Sharp, C.
Affiliations
Baylor College of Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Sharp, Carla
Venue
Cognition and Emotion
Published
2008-08
Volume
22
Issue
6
Pages
1149-1158
ISSN
  • 0269-9931 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0600
OpenAlex
W2008793698
Cited by
101
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cognition & Emotion (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
theory of mind, conduct problems, antisocial behavior, psychopathy, amygdala, social cognition, preadolescents, adolescents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review