Cited by 70Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesAttachment and Relationship DynamicsEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

Incidental regulation of attraction: The neural basis of the derogation of attractive alternatives in romantic relationships

Open access
Meyer, Meghan L., Berkman, Elliot T., Karremans, Johan C., Lieberman, Matthew D.·2011·Cognition and Emotion

Abstract

Although a great deal of research addresses the neural basis of deliberate and intentional emotion-regulation strategies, less attention has been paid to the neural mechanisms involved in implicit forms of emotion regulation. Behavioural research suggests that romantically involved participants implicitly derogate the attractiveness of alternative partners, and the present study sought to examine the neural basis of this effect. Romantically committed participants in the present study were scanned with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while indicating whether they would consider each of a series of attractive (or unattractive) opposite-sex others as a hypothetical dating partner both while under cognitive load and no cognitive load. Successful derogation of attractive others during the no cognitive load compared to the cognitive load trials corresponded with increased activation in the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC) and posterior dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (pDMPFC), and decreased activation in the ventral striatum, a pattern similar to those reported in deliberate emotion-regulation studies. Activation in the VLPFC and pDMPFC was not significant in the cognitive load condition, indicating that while the derogation effect may be implicit, it nonetheless requires cognitive resources. Additionally, activation in the right VLPFC correlated with participants' level of relationship investment. These findings suggest that the RVLPFC may play a particularly important role in implicitly regulating the emotions that threaten the stability of a romantic relationship.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02699931.2010.527494

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In one study, the right vlPFC and the posterior dmPFC increased activation during the devaluation of attractive individuals, with right vlPFC activation correlated with participants' level of investment in their relationship.

    “The right vlPFC and the posterior dmPFC increased activation during the devaluation of attractive individuals, with right vlPFC activation correlated with participants’ level of investment in their relationship [162,163].”
  • Humans maintain bonds by devaluing the attractiveness of potential partners once in a romantic relationship; this relies on proper executive control and is diminished in the presence of enhanced cognitive load.

    “Humans also maintain bonds by devaluing the attractiveness of potential partners once in a romantic relationship; however, this relies on proper executive control and is diminished in the presence of enhanced cognitive load (Figure 2e).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 56 · Cited by 70

Authors
Meyer, M. L., Berkman, E. T., Karremans, J. C., & Lieberman, M. D.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • University of Oregon (US)
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Corresponding author
Meyer, Meghan L.
Venue
Cognition and Emotion
Published
2011-03-15
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
490-505
ISSN
  • 0269-9931 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0600
OpenAlex
W2139687644
Cited by
70
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cognition & Emotion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (F31DA024904)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
implicit emotion regulation, romantic relationships, partner attractiveness, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, ventral striatum, cognitive load, relationship investment, relationship stability
MeSH terms
Adult, Basal Ganglia, Brain Mapping, Cognition, Emotions, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Social Control, Informal, Unconscious, Psychology, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review