Incidental regulation of attraction: The neural basis of the derogation of attractive alternatives in romantic relationships
Open accessAbstract
Although a great deal of research addresses the neural basis of deliberate and intentional emotion-regulation strategies, less attention has been paid to the neural mechanisms involved in implicit forms of emotion regulation. Behavioural research suggests that romantically involved participants implicitly derogate the attractiveness of alternative partners, and the present study sought to examine the neural basis of this effect. Romantically committed participants in the present study were scanned with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while indicating whether they would consider each of a series of attractive (or unattractive) opposite-sex others as a hypothetical dating partner both while under cognitive load and no cognitive load. Successful derogation of attractive others during the no cognitive load compared to the cognitive load trials corresponded with increased activation in the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC) and posterior dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (pDMPFC), and decreased activation in the ventral striatum, a pattern similar to those reported in deliberate emotion-regulation studies. Activation in the VLPFC and pDMPFC was not significant in the cognitive load condition, indicating that while the derogation effect may be implicit, it nonetheless requires cognitive resources. Additionally, activation in the right VLPFC correlated with participants' level of relationship investment. These findings suggest that the RVLPFC may play a particularly important role in implicitly regulating the emotions that threaten the stability of a romantic relationship.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In one study, the right vlPFC and the posterior dmPFC increased activation during the devaluation of attractive individuals, with right vlPFC activation correlated with participants' level of investment in their relationship.
“The right vlPFC and the posterior dmPFC increased activation during the devaluation of attractive individuals, with right vlPFC activation correlated with participants’ level of investment in their relationship [162,163].”
From The Neurobiology of Love and Pair Bonding from Human and Animal Perspectives (2023) · cites this paper as [162]
Humans maintain bonds by devaluing the attractiveness of potential partners once in a romantic relationship; this relies on proper executive control and is diminished in the presence of enhanced cognitive load.
“Humans also maintain bonds by devaluing the attractiveness of potential partners once in a romantic relationship; however, this relies on proper executive control and is diminished in the presence of enhanced cognitive load (Figure 2e).”
From The Neurobiology of Love and Pair Bonding from Human and Animal Perspectives (2023) · cites this paper as [162]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 56 · Cited by 70
- Authors
- Meyer, M. L., Berkman, E. T., Karremans, J. C., & Lieberman, M. D.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- University of Oregon (US)
- Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Meyer, Meghan L.
- Venue
- Cognition and Emotion
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-03-15
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 490-505
- ISSN
- 0269-9931 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0600
- PMC
- PMC3072221
- OpenAlex
- W2139687644
- Cited by
- 70
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Cognition & Emotion (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (F31DA024904)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Keywords
- implicit emotion regulation, romantic relationships, partner attractiveness, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, ventral striatum, cognitive load, relationship investment, relationship stability
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Basal Ganglia, Brain Mapping, Cognition, Emotions, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Social Control, Informal, Unconscious, Psychology, Prefrontal Cortex
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review