Discomfort and avoidance of touch: new insights on the emotional deficits of social anxiety
Abstract
Physical touch is central to the emotional intimacy that separates romantic relationships from other social contexts. In this study of 256 adults (128 heterosexual couples, mean relationship length = 20.5 months), we examined whether individual differences in social anxiety influenced comfort with and avoidance of physical touch. Because of prior work on sex difference in touch use, touch comfort, and social anxiety symptoms and impairment, we explored sex-specific findings. We found evidence that women with greater social anxiety were less comfortable with touch and more avoidant of touch in same-sex friendships. Additionally, a woman's social anxiety had a bigger effect on a man's comfort with touch and avoidance of touch in the romantic relationship than a man's social anxiety had on the woman's endorsement of touch-related problems. These effects were uninfluenced by the length of romantic relationships. Touch is a neglected emotional experience that offers new insights into the difficulties of individuals suffering from social anxiety problems, and their romantic partners.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
People with SAD show greater discomfort with social touch, heightened levels of interpersonal distrust, increased amygdala activity in response to emotional stimuli, and heightened loneliness in SAD youth.
“Other examples of this pervasive sense of threat in interpersonal relationships is the greater discomfort with social touch among people higher in social anxiety (59), heightened levels of interpersonal distrust (60), increased amygdala activity in response to emotional stimuli (61), and heightened loneliness in SAD youth (62).”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 44 · Cited by 19
- Authors
- Kashdan, T. B., Doorley, J., Stiksma, M. C., & Hertenstein, M. J.
- Affiliations
- George Mason University (US)
- DePauw University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kashdan, Todd B.
- Venue
- Cognition and Emotion
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-11-22
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1638-1646
- ISSN
- 0269-9931 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0600
- OpenAlex
- W2550641009
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 1.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cognition & Emotion (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Values in Action Institute (None)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Keywords
- social anxiety, physical contact, romantic relationships, same-sex friendships, sex differences, emotional intimacy, partner effects, relationship duration
- MeSH terms
- Phobia, Social, Anxiety, Avoidance Learning, Emotions, Family Characteristics, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Sex Characteristics, Touch, Friends, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review