Cited by 20Aesthetic Perception and AnalysisPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionPsychological and Educational Research Studies

Experimental elicitations of awe: A meta-analysis

Pérez, Kenneth A., Lench, Heather C., Thompson, Christopher G., North, Sophia·2023·Cognition and Emotion

Abstract

A meta-analytic review of studies that experimentally elicited awe and compared the emotion to other conditions (84; 487 effects; 17,801 participants) examined the degree to which experimentally elicited awe (1) affects outcomes relative to other positive emotions (2) affects experience, judgment, behaviour, and physiology, and (3) differs in its effects if the awe state was elicited through positive or threatening contexts. The efficacy of methods that have been used to experimentally elicit awe and the possibility of assessing changes in the state of the self with experimental awe elicitations were also examined. Meta-analyses with robust variance estimation revealed that awe affected outcomes compared to other positive emotions and control conditions; affected experience, judgment, and behaviour; and had similar effects if elicited through positive or threatening contexts. The ability to compare awe to negative emotion states and its effects on physiology was limited by a small number of available effects. Images, videos, autobiographical recall, and naturalistic exposure were effective in eliciting awe. Exploratory analyses suggested that some processes involved in changes in the self can be related to experimental awe elicitations. These findings suggest awe is a discrete emotion and identifies areas for future investigation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02699931.2022.2140126

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Experimental and field studies suggest that scaled or simulated awe stimuli can reliably elicit measurable shifts in self-perception and meaning.

    “Although such experiences are context-sensitive and not uniformly replicable, experimental and field studies suggest that scaled or simulated awe stimuli can reliably elicit measurable shifts in self-perception and meaning (104, 105).”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 82 · Cited by 20

Authors
Pérez, K. A., Lench, H. C., Thompson, C. G., & North, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Connecticut (US)
  • Texas A&M University (US)
Corresponding author
Pérez, Kenneth A.
Venue
Cognition and Emotion
Published
2022-11-04
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
18-33
ISSN
  • 0269-9931 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0600
OpenAlex
W4308182014
Cited by
20
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cognition & Emotion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Educational Research Studies
Keywords
awe, positive emotions, autobiographical recall
MeSH terms
Emotions, Humans, Judgment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review