Cited by 86Narrative Theory and AnalysisMedia Influence and HealthAesthetic Perception and Analysis

The landscape of time in literary reception: Character experience and narrative action

Cupchik, Gerald C., Laszlo, Janos·1994·Cognition & Emotion

Abstract

This experiment examined responses to excerpted episodes from short stories that either focused on action or on the experiences of the characters. The effects of instructional sets to approach the texts from the viewpoint of subjective involvement or objective detachment were also studied. The two story types and two reading sets were factorially combined in a within-subjects design. Scale ratings of the story excerpts and reading times (syllables per second) were measured. A total of subjects (20 males and 20 females) read six segments from each of the episodes as quickly and accurately as possible. Pretest data were obtained for each segment indicating how much it “provided insight into the characters' experiences”, and its level of suspense and surprise. Segments which “provided in sight” were read more slowly, whereas surprising segments were read more quickly. Under the Subjective Set, subjects slowed the pace of reading if they judged the text to be “rich in meaning about life”. For the Objective Set, stories that were judged to have evoked “images” were read more slowly. Females were more responsive to the Subjective Set than were the males, finding the stories to be “richer in meaning” and more “personally relevant”. Females also slowed their reading pace for segments that they judged to be “rich in meaning about life”, while males slowed down if the stories evoked “images”.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02699939408408943

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fiction genres more related to real life contexts, contemporary life experiences and/or characters' inner experiences may have more potential to support readers' empathy.

    “Indeed, fiction genres that are more related to real life contexts, contemporary life experiences and/or characters ' inner experiences may have more potential to support readers ' empathy, as they allow readers to explore characters from within (Cupchik and László, 1994; Kuzmi č ová and Cremin, 2022; László and Cupchik, 1995).”

    From Reading and Empathy: Qualitative insights into adolescents' experiences with fiction books (2025) · cites this paper as Cupchik and László, 1994

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cupchik, G. C., & Laszlo, J.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Venue
Cognition & Emotion
Published
1994-07
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
297-312
ISSN
  • 0269-9931 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0600
OpenAlex
W2149710511
Cited by
86
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 24 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 17 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
25.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cognition & Emotion (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Narrative Theory and Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
Keywords
literary reception, narrative action, character experience, reading speed, reading time, suspense, surprise, gender differences, meaning in life, imagery, short stories

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review