The landscape of time in literary reception: Character experience and narrative action
Abstract
This experiment examined responses to excerpted episodes from short stories that either focused on action or on the experiences of the characters. The effects of instructional sets to approach the texts from the viewpoint of subjective involvement or objective detachment were also studied. The two story types and two reading sets were factorially combined in a within-subjects design. Scale ratings of the story excerpts and reading times (syllables per second) were measured. A total of subjects (20 males and 20 females) read six segments from each of the episodes as quickly and accurately as possible. Pretest data were obtained for each segment indicating how much it “provided insight into the characters' experiences”, and its level of suspense and surprise. Segments which “provided in sight” were read more slowly, whereas surprising segments were read more quickly. Under the Subjective Set, subjects slowed the pace of reading if they judged the text to be “rich in meaning about life”. For the Objective Set, stories that were judged to have evoked “images” were read more slowly. Females were more responsive to the Subjective Set than were the males, finding the stories to be “richer in meaning” and more “personally relevant”. Females also slowed their reading pace for segments that they judged to be “rich in meaning about life”, while males slowed down if the stories evoked “images”.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Fiction genres more related to real life contexts, contemporary life experiences and/or characters' inner experiences may have more potential to support readers' empathy.
“Indeed, fiction genres that are more related to real life contexts, contemporary life experiences and/or characters ' inner experiences may have more potential to support readers ' empathy, as they allow readers to explore characters from within (Cupchik and László, 1994; Kuzmi č ová and Cremin, 2022; László and Cupchik, 1995).”
From Reading and Empathy: Qualitative insights into adolescents' experiences with fiction books (2025) · cites this paper as Cupchik and László, 1994
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Keen, S. (2006) · Narrative · doi:10.1353/nar.2006.0015 · Cited by 605 · see citing works
Meetings of minds: Dialogue, sympathy, and identification, in reading fiction
Oatley, K. (1999) · Poetics · doi:10.1016/s0304-422x(99)00011-x · Cited by 332 · see citing works
Reading and Empathy: Qualitative insights into adolescents' experiences with fiction books
Santi, E., Cebula, K., & McGeown, S. (2025) · Literacy · doi:10.1111/lit.70006 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“…more related to real life contexts, contemporary life experiences and/or characters ’ inner experiences may have more potential to support readers ’ empathy, as they allow readers to explore characters from within (Cupchik and László, 1994; Kuzmi č ová and Cremin, 2022; László and Cupchik, 1995).”
- Authors
- Cupchik, G. C., & Laszlo, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- ORCID
- Cupchik, Gerald C.
- Venue
- Cognition & Emotion
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1994-07
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 297-312
- ISSN
- 0269-9931 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0600
- OpenAlex
- W2149710511
- Cited by
- 86
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 24 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 17 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 25.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cognition & Emotion (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Narrative Theory and Analysis
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
- Keywords
- literary reception, narrative action, character experience, reading speed, reading time, suspense, surprise, gender differences, meaning in life, imagery, short stories
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review