The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Experience of Regret and Disappointment
Open accessAbstract
Regret and disappointment have in common the fact that they are experienced when the outcome of a decision is unfavourable: They both concern “what might have been”, had things been different. However, some regret and disappointment theorists regard the differences between these emotions as important, arguing that they differ with respect to the conditions under which they are felt, and how they affect decision making. The goal of the present research was to examine whether and how these emotions also differ with respect to the way in which they are experienced. Participants were asked torecall aninstance of intense regret or disappointment andto indicate what they felt, thought, felt like doing, did, and were motivated to do during this experience (cf. Roseman, Wiest, & Swartz, 1994). Significant differences between regret and disappointment were found in every category. These differences were most pronounced for “action tendencies” (what participants felt like doing) and “emotivations” (what they were motivated to do). These results suggest that the two emotions have differential implications for future behaviour.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regret Theory: An Alternative Theory of Rational Choice Under Uncertainty
Loomes, G., & Sugden, R. (1982) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2232669 · Cited by 4,042
Relations among emotion, appraisal, and emotional action readiness
Frijda, N. H., Kuipers, P., & ter Schure, E. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.2.212 · Cited by 2,379
Cited by
Lerner, J. S., Li, Y., Valdesolo, P., & Kassam, K. S. (2015) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115043 · Cited by 2,913
Roseman, I. J. (2011) · Emotion Review · doi:10.1177/1754073911410744 · Cited by 200
The Mediating Role of Anticipated Guilt in Consumers’ Ethical Decision-Making
Steenhaut, S., & Van Kenhove, P. (2006) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9090-9 · Cited by 185
Lelieveld, G.-J., Van Dijk, E., Van Beest, I., & Van Kleef, G. A. (2013) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0033345 · Cited by 74
Brattström, A., & Faems, D. (2020) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2018.0038 · Cited by 63
(2006) · doi:10.4324/9780203726594 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Zeelenberg, M., van Dijk, W. W., S.R.Manstead, A., & der Pligt, J.
- Venue
- Cognition and Emotion
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1998-03
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 221-230
- ISSN
- 0269-9931 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0600
- OpenAlex
- W2098319011
- Cited by
- 327
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.