Cited by 142Cardiovascular and exercise physiologySports Performance and TrainingPhysical Activity and Health

A Meta-Analysis of Studies Comparing Maximal Oxygen Uptake in Men and Women

Sparling, Phillip B.·1980·Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport

Abstract

Since [Vdot]O2 max (ml/minute · kg body weight) is known to be the primary determinant of work capacity in weight-bearing exercise, the quantification of sex-specific factors influencing aerobic capacity is necessary if appropriate work capacity and endurance performance expectations and standards are to be developed for men and women. Yet, due to varying procedures and sample characteristics, large discrepancies exist among studies concerning the magnitude of the sex difference in [Vdot]O2 max. The purpose of this article is to provide an integrative review of the research comparing [Vdot]O2 max in men and women using the meta-analytic strategy proposed by Glass (1976). An overall estimate of the magnitude of the sex effect for each of three expressions of [Vdot]O2 max is provided. When removing the variability in aerobic capacity due to body size and body fatness, the magnitude of difference in [Vdot]O2 max between men and women is substantially reduced. When expressed relative to fat-free weight, the [Vdot]O2 max values of the males are, on the average, 12 to 15% higher than those of the females. Sex-specific differences in relative hemoglobin content may be responsible for a part of this remaining difference. However, a substantial portion of the sex difference in [Vdot]O2 max (ml/minute · kg fat-free weight) is probably attributable to gender-associated differences in level of physical activity/conditioning. The ability to clearly identify the sex-related components of aerobic capacity is an objective warranting further investigation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02701367.1980.10608077

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 38 · Cited by 142

Authors
Sparling, P. B.
Affiliations
Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Sparling, Phillip B.
Venue
Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport
Published
1980-10
Volume
51
Issue
3
Pages
542-552
ISSN
  • 0034-5377 (ISSN-L)
  • 0270-1367
  • 2168-3824
OpenAlex
W2077094344
Cited by
142
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
VO2max, sex differences, cardiorespiratory fitness, fat-free weight, body size, fat mass, hemoglobin levels, physical activity level, endurance performance, work capacity
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Male, Oxygen Consumption, Sex Factors, Statistics as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review