Cited by 119Physical Education and PedagogySchool Health and Nursing EducationPhysical Education and Training Studies

Effects of a Curriculum and Inservice Program on the Quantity and Quality of Elementary Physical Education Classes

McKenzie, Thomas L., Sallis, James F., Faucette, Nell, Roby, Julia J., Kolody, Bohdan·1993·Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport

Abstract

The primary responsibility for engaging children in opportunities to be physically active and learn physical skills rests with school physical education. This study evaluated the effects of a combined health-related curriculum and inservice program on the quantity and quality of elementary school physical education lessons. Seven schools (N = 28 fourth-grade classes) in one district were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: 10 classes were taught in their usual manner by classroom teachers (Control [CO]); 10 classes were taught by trained classroom teachers (TT) who received inservice training and follow-up consultations; and 8 classes were taught by physical education specialists (PES) hired by the research project. Student activity level, curriculum context, and teacher behavior were directly observed and coded during a sample of 112 lessons over an 8-month period. Results indicated significant differences in both the frequency and mean length of classes (PES, 26.7 min; TT, 23.4 min; CO, 18.9 min). Additionally, the curriculum and inservice program equipped trained classroom teachers to provide significantly better classes than were provided by controls in terms of student activity engagement, lesson context, and active instructional behavior, though their classes did not match the quality of those taught by the physical education specialists. This study is unique in its use of direct observation of lessons to assess a curriculum and inservice intervention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02701367.1993.10608795

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 119

Authors
McKenzie, T. L., Sallis, J. F., Faucette, N., Roby, J. J., & Kolody, B.
Affiliations
  • San Diego State University (US)
  • University of South Florida (US)
Venue
Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport
Published
1993-06
Volume
64
Issue
2
Pages
178-187
ISSN
  • 0034-5377 (ISSN-L)
  • 0270-1367
  • 2168-3824
OpenAlex
W2097356146
Cited by
119
References
28
Citations by year
2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
13.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01hl044467-07)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL 44467)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Physical Education and Pedagogy
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Physical Education and Training Studies
Keywords
elementary school physical education, continuing teacher education, physical education professionals, classroom teachers, lesson duration, teacher instructional behavior, curriculum intervention, fourth grade
MeSH terms
Curriculum, Educational Measurement, Humans, Learning, Physical Education and Training, Schools, Teaching

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review