Cited by 91EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSecond Language Acquisition and LearningInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An Initial Study of the Effects of Cooperative Learning on Reading Comprehension, Vocabulary Acquisition, and Motivation to Read

Shaaban, Kassim·2006·Reading Psychology

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of the Jigsaw II cooperative learning (CL) model and whole class instruction in improving learners' reading comprehension, vocabulary acquisition, and motivation to read. Forty-four grade five English as a foreign language learners participated in the study, and a posttest-only control group experimental design was employed. The results did not indicate any statistically significant differences between the control and experimental group on the dependent variables of reading comprehension and vocabulary acquisition. However, the results revealed statistically significant differences in favor of the experimental group on the dependent variable of motivation to read and its dimensions, the value of reading, and reading self-concept. The pedagogical implications of the findings and suggestions for further research are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02702710600846613

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 35 references

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Brody C., 1998, Professional development for cooperative learning
  2. Fenimore F., 1968, Journal of Reading, 11, 447
  3. Gambrell L., 1996, The Reading Teacher, 50, 14
  4. Henderson E. H., 1965, Reading Teacher, 19, 114
  5. Holmes J. A., 1961, Journal of Developmental Reading, 4, 111
  6. Kagan S., 1985, Cooperative learning resources for teachers
  7. Kagan S., 1995, We can talk: Cooperative learning in the ESL classroom (Report No. EDO-FL-95-08)
  8. Mattingly R. M., 1991, Social Education, 55, 392
  9. Maudville T. F., 1994, The Reading Teacher, 47, 679
  10. McGinitie W., 1989, Gates-McGinitie Reading Tests,
  11. Oldfather P., 1995, Journal of Reading, 36, 420
  12. Palmer B. M., 1994, The Reading Teacher, 48, 176
  13. Rolheiser C., 1998, Professional development for cooperative learning, 61
  14. Slavin R., 1978, Journal of Research and Development in Education, 12, 39
  15. Slavin R., 1986, Team accelerated instruction: Mathema-tics
  16. Slavin R. E., 1986, Using student team learning,
  17. Slavin R. E., 1995, Cooperative leaning theory, research, and practice
  18. Swerdlik M. E., 1994, Review of Gates-MacGinitie reading tests
  19. Turner J., 1995, The Reading Teacher, 48, 662

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 91

Metadata

Authors
Shaaban, K.
Affiliations
American University of Beirut (LB)
Corresponding author
Shaaban, Kassim
Venue
Reading Psychology
Published
2006-12
Volume
27
Issue
5
Pages
377-403
ISSN
  • 0270-2711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-0685
OpenAlex
W2139693616
Cited by
78
References
35
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 1
FWCI
28.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Reading Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
cooperative learning, Jigsaw II, reading comprehension, vocabulary acquisition, English as a foreign language, fifth grade students, reading self-concept, value of reading, whole-class instruction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Initial Study of the Effects of Cooperative Learning on Reading Comprehension, Vocabulary Acquisition, and Motivation to Read. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/02702710600846613
The paper
Shaaban, K. (2006). An Initial Study of the Effects of Cooperative Learning on Reading Comprehension, Vocabulary Acquisition, and Motivation to Read. Reading Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710600846613