Kindergarten Children’s Academic Skills: Association with Public Library Use, Shared Book Reading and Poverty
Abstract
Background Few studies have examined associations of public library use and shared book reading to kindergarten children’s academic skills.Methods The study sample consisted of 13,385 kindergarten students enrolled in the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Kindergarten Class of 2010–2011 (ECLS-K: 2011). Parents reported on public library use in the past month (yes/no) and frequency of shared book reading in the past week. Cross-sectional linear regression analyses examined associations of kindergarten children’s academic skills with public library use and shared book reading. Interactions between poverty with shared book reading and public library use on academics were assessed.Results 59.6% of children visited a public library and 86.5% engaged in shared book reading at least three times a week. Public library use and shared book reading differed by socio-demographics. Higher academic scores were positively associated with public library use and shared book reading. A significant interaction between poverty and public library use was not identified. Shared book reading was associated with higher academic scores for all children, especially for children from higher socioeconomic backgrounds.Conclusion Public library use and shared book reading were independent predictors of kindergarten children’s academic skills. Disparities in public library use, shared book reading and academics were identified.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Library participation showed weaker effects.
“Library participation showed weaker effects, which is unexpected given its role in literacy (Mann et al., 2021).”
From Participation in extracurricular activities predicts academic growth and mediates socioeconomic inequalities in primary school (2026) · cites this paper as Mann et al., 2021
Cites
Reading aloud to children: the evidence
Duursma, E., Augustyn, M., & Zuckerman, B. (2008) · Archives of Disease in Childhood · doi:10.1136/adc.2006.106336 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Literacy promotion for Hispanic families in a primary care setting: A randomized, controlled trial
Golova, N., Alario, A. J., Vivier, P. M., Rodriguez, M., & High, P. C. (1999) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.103.5.993 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
High, P., Hopmann, M., LaGasse, L., & Linn, H. (1998) · Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine · doi:10.1001/archpedi.152.5.459 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
The impact of public library use on reading, television, and academic outcomes
Bhatt, R. (2010) · Journal of Urban Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jue.2010.03.008 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Brunet, L., Rémeau, M., Houdé, O., & Borst, G. (2026) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjep.70127
- Authors
- Mann, M., Silver, E. J., & Stein, R. E. K.
- Affiliations
- Montefiore Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Mann, Mana
- Venue
- Reading Psychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2021-02-24
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 606-624
- ISSN
- 0270-2711 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-0685
- OpenAlex
- W3131385272
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 2.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Reading Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Administration
- Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
- Keywords
- public library use, shared book reading, kindergarten children, academic skills, poverty, socioeconomic disparities, early literacy, early childhood education, ECLS-K:2011
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review