The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Regulate, replicate, and resist – the conjunctural geographies of platform urbanism
Open accessAbstract
Platforms in the urban environment are fundamentally unaccountable. They present themselves as too big to control, too new to regulate, and too innovative to stifle, and remain un-democratic, and usually distant, organizations with no interest in promoting local voices or investing in local priorities. This paper argues that platforms control urban interactions whilst remaining unaccountable through a strategic deployment of ‘conjunctural geographies’ – a way of being simultaneously embedded and disembedded from the space-times they mediate. These conjunctural geographies, however, render platforms vulnerable. The ephemeral nature of platforms means we can avoid them, circumvent them and replicate them; their material nature suggests points of regulation and resistance. The paper closes by pointing to three broad strategies —regulate, replicate, and resist - which can be deployed to build alternate platform futures. Each of which is built on understanding the simultaneously embedded and disembedded ways in which platforms occupy their conjunctural geographies.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The widespread prevalence of Class 4, Focused Digital Integrators, across diverse regional contexts renders deterministic assumptions included in the Spatial Inequality Thesis [53] doubtful.
“Simultaneously, the widespread prevalence of Class 4, Focused Digital Integrators, across diverse regional contexts renders deterministic assumptions included in the Spatial Inequality Thesis [53] doubtful because this thesis assumes that digitalization maintains existing territorial inequalities.”
From Divergent Paths of SME Digitalization: A Latent Class Approach to Regional Modernization in the European Union (2025) · cites this paper as [53]
The Core-Periphery Dynamics thesis posits the presence of 'digital deserts' ordered by spatial digital divides.
“First, they invalidate the Core-Periphery Dynamics thesis [34,53], which posits the presence of”
From Divergent Paths of SME Digitalization: A Latent Class Approach to Regional Modernization in the European Union (2025) · cites this paper as [53]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2005.00454.x · DOI
- Ford, Heather. & Graham, Mark. (2016). Semantic cities: Coded geopolitics and the rise of the semantic web. In R. Kitchin, & S-Y. Perng (Eds.), Code and the City (pp. 200–214). London: Routledge.
- 10.1068/a140275p · DOI
- Graham Mark., 2018, The globalizing cities reader, 198
- 10.1111/tran.12076 · DOI
- 10.1002/geo2.8 · DOI
- Massey Doreen., 2005, For space
- 10.1093/oso/9780198797012.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511615702 · DOI · Paper page
- Srnicek Nick., 2017, Platform capitalism
- Thornton Pip., 2017, Computational Culture
- 10.1177/0038038519828906 · DOI
- Woodcock Jamie., 2019, The gig economy
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zheleva, R., Petkova, K., & Zdravkov, S. (2025) · World · doi:10.3390/world6040144 · Cited by 2
“First, they invalidate the Core–Periphery Dynamics thesis [34,53], which posits the presence of “digital deserts” ordered by spatial digital divides.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Graham, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Graham, Mark
- ORCID
- Graham, Mark
- Venue
- Urban Geography
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-01-23
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 453-457
- ISSN
- 0272-3638 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-2847
- OpenAlex
- W3002251334
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 14
- FWCI
- 66.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Urban Geography (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- OpenDocs (Institute of Development Studies) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/N510129/1)
- European Research Council (335716)
- Leverhulme Trust (PLP-2016-155)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban Planning and Governance
- Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Smart Cities and Technologies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Economy and Work Transformation
- Keywords
- platform urbanism, urban platforms, platform accountability, urban regulation, urban democracy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review