The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Review of Recent Developments in Research and Theories on Human Contingency Learning
Abstract
Over the past 20 years, human contingency learning has resurfaced as an important topic within experimental psychology. This renewed interest was sparked mainly by the proposal that associative models of Pavlovian conditioning might also apply to human contingency learning—a proposal that has led to many new empirical findings and theoretical developments. We provide a brief review of these recent developments and try to point to issues that need to be addressed in future research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement
Mackintosh, N. J. (1975) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0076778 · Cited by 2,733
Probability of shock in the presence and absence of cs in fear conditioning.
Rescorla, R. A. (1968) · Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0025984 · Cited by 1,067 · cited 2×
“, Rescorla, 1968). However, they quickly discovered that the statistical contingency between CS and US is not the only thing that matters. Most important, Kamin (1969) demonstrated that conditioned responses toward a target CS, T, also depend on the statistical contingency between other CSs and the US.”
BackgroundThe Psychology of Associative Learning
Shanks, D. R. (1995) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511623288 · Cited by 387
Cited by
Nosek, B. A., Smyth, F. L., Sriram, N., Lindner, N. M., Devos, T., Ayala, A., Bar-Anan, Y., Bergh, R., Cai, H., Gonsalkorale, K., et al. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0809921106 · Cited by 1,050
De Houwer, J. (2009) · Learning & Behavior · doi:10.3758/lb.37.1.1 · Cited by 362
Self-citationLe Pelley, M. E. (2004) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section B · doi:10.1080/02724990344000141 · Cited by 360
Rapid extraction of auditory feature contingencies
Bendixen, A., Prinz, W., Horváth, J., Trujillo-Barreto, N. J., & Schröger, E. (2008) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.03.040 · Cited by 88
Warren, V. T., Anderson, K. M., Kwon, C., Bosshardt, L., Jovanovic, T., Bradley, B., & Norrholm, S. D. (2014) · Neurobiology of Learning and Memory · doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2013.10.014 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- De Houwer, J., & Beckers, T.
- Venue
- The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section B
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-10
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 4b
- Pages
- 289-310
- ISSN
- 0272-4995 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-1321
- OpenAlex
- W2103614925
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 4.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Review of Recent Developments in Research and Theories on Human Contingency Learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/02724990244000034
- The paper
- De Houwer, J., & Beckers, T. (2002). A Review of Recent Developments in Research and Theories on Human Contingency Learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section B. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724990244000034
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
