Cited by 23Atmospheric chemistry and aerosolsGranular flow and fluidized bedsAdvanced Combustion Engine Technologies

Design and Characterization of a Fluidized Bed Aerosol Generator: A Source for Dry, Submicrometer Aerosol

Open access
Prenni, Anthony J., Siefert, Ronald L., Onasch, Timothy B., Tolbert, Margaret A., Demott, Paul J.·2000·Aerosol Science and Technology

Abstract

A fluidized bed aerosol generator has been designed and built for the purpose of generating a constant output of dry, submicrometer particles with a large number density. The output of the fluidized bed for generating aerosol particles from dry soot powder has been characterized using a differential mobility analyzer and a condensation particle counter. The particle size distribution is bimodal, with a mode in the submicrometer diameter size range and a mode in the supermicrometer diameter size range. The larger diameter mode is fully separated from the smaller mode and can thus be easily removed from the aerosol flow using impaction techniques. The distribution in the submicrometer size range is nearly log-normal, with a count median diameter falling between 0.1 and 0.3 micrometers. A number density of greater than 105 particles cm-3 of soot particles in the submicrometer range can be produced, constant to within 25% (1 standard deviation) over a 4 h time period. The number density of particles produced in the submicrometer range was found to vary with the ratio of soot to bronze beads in the bed mixture, whether or not a feed system was used, and nitrogen flow rate through the fluidized bed and feed system.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/027868200303588

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Few if any aerosol dispersal methods described in the literature offer the potential for dispersing 1 million Mt yr-1.

    “Few if any aerosol dispersal methods described in the literature offer the potential for dispersing a million Mt yr 21 [Prenni et al. (2000) presents an interesting possibility].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 23

Authors
Prenni, A. J., Siefert, R. L., Onasch, T. B., Tolbert, M. A., & Demott, P. J.
Affiliations
University of Colorado System (US)
Venue
Aerosol Science and Technology
Published
2000-05
Volume
32
Issue
5
Pages
465-481
ISSN
  • 0278-6826 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-7388
OpenAlex
W2126177590
Cited by
23
References
0
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Aerosol Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Granular flow and fluidized beds
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes › Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Keywords
submicron aerosols, soot particles, particle number density, particle size distribution, bimodal size distribution, lognormal distribution, differential mobility analyzer, condensation particle counter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review