The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Relationship between Mass and Mobility for Atmospheric Particles: A New Technique for Measuring Particle Density
Open accessAbstract
We describe a new technique for measuring the relationship between electrical mobility and mass. For spherical particles, the mass-mobility relationship can be used to determine particle density. For nonspherical particles, this relationship is affected by both the density and the dynamic shape factor; additional information would be required to determine either one. However, combinations of shape factors and densities that are consistent with measurements can be obtained. We show that the density of spherical particles of known composition can be measured to within ∼5% with this approach. We applied the technique to urban atmospheric aerosols of ∼0.1 and ∼0.3 w m in Atlanta, GA, during August 1999. The Atlanta data show that particles of a given mobility often have several distinct masses. Based on complementary measurements, we argue that the most abundant mass consists of spherical hygroscopic particles. The measured mass for these particles (assuming that they are spherical) fell into the range of 1.54 to 1.77 g cm -3 at 3-6% relative humidity, which agreed to within about 5% of values calculated based on the measured size-resolved composition. Particles that were more and less massive than these were also observed. The less massive particles had "effective densities" of 0.25-0.64 g cm -3 and the more massive particles had "effective densities" of 1.7-2.2 g cm -3 . We hypothesize that the less massive particles consist of chain agglomerate soot.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Light Absorption by Carbonaceous Particles: An Investigative Review
Bond, T. C., & Bergstrom, R. W. (2006) · Aerosol Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/02786820500421521 · Cited by 2,980
DeCarlo, P., Slowik, J., Worsnop, D., Davidovits, P., & Jimenez, J. (2004) · Aerosol Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/02786826.2004.10399461 · Cited by 1,239
Van Dingenen, R., Raes, F., Putaud, J.-P., Baltensperger, U., Charron, A., Facchini, M.-C., Decesari, S., Fuzzi, S., Gehrig, R., Hansson, H.-C., et al. (2004) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.01.040 · Cited by 1,011
Effects of Mixing State on Black Carbon Measurements by Laser-Induced Incandescence
Moteki, N., & Kondo, Y. (2007) · Aerosol Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/02786820701199728 · Cited by 309
Measurement of Inherent Material Density of Nanoparticle Agglomerates
Park, K., Kittelson, D. B., Zachariah, M. R., & McMurry, P. H. (2004) · Journal of Nanoparticle Research · doi:10.1023/b:nano.0000034657.71309.e6 · Cited by 301
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- McMurry, P. H., Wang, X., Park, K., & Ehara, K.
- Venue
- Aerosol Science and Technology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 227-238
- ISSN
- 0278-6826 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-7388
- OpenAlex
- W2021279663
- Cited by
- 460
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Relationship between Mass and Mobility for Atmospheric Particles: A New Technique for Measuring Particle Density. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/027868202753504083
- The paper
- McMurry, P. H., Wang, X., Park, K., & Ehara, K. (2002). The Relationship between Mass and Mobility for Atmospheric Particles: A New Technique for Measuring Particle Density. Aerosol Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/027868202753504083
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.