The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Seasonal Trends of Concentration and Size Distribution of Ultrafine Particles Near Major Highways in Los Angeles Special Issue of Aerosol Science and Technology on Findings from the Fine Particulate Matter Supersites Program
Open accessAbstract
Ultrafine particles (diameter <0.1 μm) have been suggested as a possible causative agent for the observed increases in mortality and morbidity with increases in particulate matter (PM) concentration. Zhu et al. conducted systematic measurements of the concentration and size distribution of ultrafine particles in the vicinity of Interstate 405 (mostly gasoline traffic) and Interstate 710 (large proportion of heavy-duty diesel traffic) in Los Angeles during the summer of 2001. The present study compares these measurements with those made at the same locations in the winter of 2001–2002. Particle number concentration and size distribution in the size range from 6 to 220 nm were measured by a condensation particle counter (CPC) and a scanning mobility particle sizer (SMPS). Measurements were taken at five distances downwind from the freeway. At each sampling location, concentrations of carbon monoxide (CO) and black carbon (BC) were also measured by a Dasibi CO monitor and an aethalometer, respectively. Average temperatures were about 7 degrees Celsius higher in summer than in winter. Wind directions are the same for both seasons, wind speeds are slightly higher in summer. Traffic densities were not statistically different between summer and winter for both the 405 and 710 freeways. The decay rates of CO and BC are slightly greater in summer than in winter for both freeways, suggesting a weaker atmospheric dilution effect in winter. Particle number concentration in the size range of 6–12 nm is significantly higher in winter than in summer. The associated concentration in that size range decreased at a slower rate in winter than in summer. The surface area concentrations in the size range of 6–220 nm are consistently higher in summer for all sampling locations. These results suggest that wintertime conditions favor greater particle formation, possibly due to increased condensation of organic vapors. These data may be useful to estimate exposure to ultrafine particles in the vicinity of major highways for epidemiological studies and to evaluate the adverse health effects of such particles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Respiratory health effects of air pollution: Update on biomass smoke and traffic pollution
Laumbach, R. J., & Kipen, H. M. (2012) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2011.11.021 · Cited by 474
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhu, Y., Hinds, W. C., Shen, S., & Sioutas, C.
- Venue
- Aerosol Science and Technology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-12
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- sup1
- Pages
- 5-13
- ISSN
- 0278-6826 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-7388
- OpenAlex
- W2155383555
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Seasonal Trends of Concentration and Size Distribution of Ultrafine Particles Near Major Highways in Los Angeles Special Issue of Aerosol Science and Technology on Findings from the Fine Particulate Matter Supersites Program. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/02786820390229156
- The paper
- Zhu, Y., Hinds, W. C., Shen, S., & Sioutas, C. (2004). Seasonal Trends of Concentration and Size Distribution of Ultrafine Particles Near Major Highways in Los Angeles Special Issue of Aerosol Science and Technology on Findings from the Fine Particulate Matter Supersites Program. Aerosol Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820390229156
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.