Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 241

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Determination of Four Quinones in Diesel Exhaust Particles, SRM 1649a, and Atmospheric PM2.5Special Issue of Aerosol Science and Technology on Findings from the Fine Particulate Matter Supersites Program

Open access
Cho, Arthur K., Di Stefano, Emma, You, Ying, Rodriguez, Chester E., Schmitz, Debra A., Kumagai, Yoshito, Miguel, Antonio H., Eiguren-Fernandez, Arantzazu, Kobayashi, Takahiro, Avol, Ed, Froines, John R.·2004·Aerosol Science and Technology

Abstract

Quinones are reactive organic compounds and are known to initiate reactions associated with many toxicological events. Their presence in air pollution has been demonstrated, but routine quantitative measurements are lacking. A quantitative method for the determination of four quinones was developed using diesel exhaust particles (DEP) and National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Standard Reference Material (SRM) 1649a. The method was then used to analyze ambient air samples from different sites in Southern California. After extraction in dichloromethane, the target compounds were converted to their stable diacetyl derivatives and determined by electron impact GC-MS using selected ion monitoring. Calibration plots were obtained with deuterium-labeled internal standards. The four quinones, 1,2-naphthoquinone (1,2-NQ), 1,4-naphthoquinone (1,4-NQ), 9,10-phenanthraquinone (9,10-PQ), and 9,10-anthraquinone (9,10-AQ), were quantified in DEP, in SRM 1649a, and in ambient air samples of PM2.5 collected in several rural and urban sampling locations upwind and downwind of major emission sources in Central Los Angeles. Mean concentration of individual target quinones ranged from 7.9–40.4 μg/g in the DEP, and from 5–730 pg/m3 in the PM2.5 samples. Precision (repeatability and reproducibility) varied from 2–22%. Further measurements of these species in future air samples should be considered in light of their potential health significance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02786820390229471

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 241

Metadata

Authors
Cho, A. K., Di Stefano, E., You, Y., Rodriguez, C. E., Schmitz, D. A., Kumagai, Y., Miguel, A. H., Eiguren-Fernandez, A., Kobayashi, T., Avol, E., & Froines, J. R.
Venue
Aerosol Science and Technology
Published
2004-12
Volume
38
Issue
sup1
Pages
68-81
ISSN
  • 0278-6826 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-7388
OpenAlex
W2090873298
Cited by
241
References
2
FWCI
10.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determination of Four Quinones in Diesel Exhaust Particles, SRM 1649a, and Atmospheric PM2.5Special Issue of Aerosol Science and Technology on Findings from the Fine Particulate Matter Supersites Program. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/02786820390229471
The paper
Cho, A. K., Di Stefano, E., You, Y., Rodriguez, C. E., Schmitz, D. A., Kumagai, Y., Miguel, A. H., Eiguren-Fernandez, A., Kobayashi, T., Avol, E., & Froines, J. R. (2004). Determination of Four Quinones in Diesel Exhaust Particles, SRM 1649a, and Atmospheric PM2.5Special Issue of Aerosol Science and Technology on Findings from the Fine Particulate Matter Supersites Program. Aerosol Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820390229471

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.