Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 255

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An Algorithm for Combining Electrical Mobility and Aerodynamic Size Distributions Data when Measuring Ambient Aerosol Special Issue of Aerosol Science and Technology on Findings from the Fine Particulate Matter Supersites Program

Open access
Khlystov, A., Stanier, C., Pandis, S. N.·2004·Aerosol Science and Technology

Abstract

Ambient aerosol particles vary in size from a few nanometers to several micrometers.No instrument is currently available to cover such a wide size range, and so a combination of several instruments is usually used.One such combination is that of electrical mobility classifiers and an aerodynamic sizer.Because of the differences in measurement principles between the instruments, difficulties arise in the combination of the measurements into a single size distribution.Here we report a simple algorithm that was developed to combine aerosol size distributions measured with commercially available scanning mobility particle sizers (SMPS; TSI Inc.) and an aerodynamic particle sizer (APS; TSI Inc.).This algorithm was tested during July 2001 in the Pittsburgh Air Quality Study.The aerosol during the study had both urban and regional origin and is characteristic of urban atmosphere in the Northeastern U.S. The integrated volume concentrations from the SMPS-APS showed a good correlation with PM 2.5 mass concentration measurements using a TEOM.The relation of the aerosol mass to its volume is an "effective" density, a ratio of the bulk aerosol density to the shape factor.As a result of the comparison with the TEOM the ambient aerosol in the Pittsburgh area was found to have an effective density of 1.5 ± 0.3 g cm -3 .Given that the aerosol during the study was found to always contain water, the particles are expected to be spherical and thus the shape factor may be assumed to be 1.This assumption has been supported by a comparison with the MOUDI, using the aerosol density of 1.5 g/cm 3 .It should be noted that the estimated aerosol density and the shape factor are applicable to this study only and may be different in other locations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02786820390229543

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Cited by

See all 255

Metadata

Authors
Khlystov, A., Stanier, C., & Pandis, S. N.
Venue
Aerosol Science and Technology
Published
2004-12
Volume
38
Issue
sup1
Pages
229-238
ISSN
  • 0278-6826 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-7388
OpenAlex
W2063094669
Cited by
255
References
10
FWCI
4.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Algorithm for Combining Electrical Mobility and Aerodynamic Size Distributions Data when Measuring Ambient Aerosol Special Issue of Aerosol Science and Technology on Findings from the Fine Particulate Matter Supersites Program. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/02786820390229543
The paper
Khlystov, A., Stanier, C., & Pandis, S. N. (2004). An Algorithm for Combining Electrical Mobility and Aerodynamic Size Distributions Data when Measuring Ambient Aerosol Special Issue of Aerosol Science and Technology on Findings from the Fine Particulate Matter Supersites Program. Aerosol Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820390229543

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.