The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Soot Particle Studies—Instrument Inter-Comparison—Project Overview
Open accessAbstract
An inter-comparison study of instruments designed to measure the microphysical and optical properties of soot particles was completed. The following mass-based instruments were tested: Couette Centrifugal Particle Mass Analyzer (CPMA), Time-of-Flight Aerosol Mass Spectrometer—Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer (AMS-SMPS), Single Particle Soot Photometer (SP2), Soot Particle-Aerosol Mass Spectrometer (SP-AMS) and Photoelectric Aerosol Sensor (PAS2000CE). Optical instruments measured absorption (photoacoustic, interferometric, and filter-based), scattering (in situ), and extinction (light attenuation within an optical cavity). The study covered an experimental matrix consisting of 318 runs that systematically tested the performance of instruments across a range of parameters including: fuel equivalence ratio (1.8 ≤ φ ≤ 5), particle shape (mass-mobility exponent ( D fm ), 2.0 ≤ D fm ≤ 3.0), particle mobility size (30 ≤ d m ≤ 300 nm), black carbon mass (0.07 ≤ m BC ≤ 4.2 fg) and particle chemical composition. In selected runs, particles were coated with sulfuric acid or dioctyl sebacate (DOS) (0.5 ≤ Δ r ve ≤ 201 nm) where Δ r ve is the change in the volume equivalent radius due to the coating material. The effect of non-absorbing coatings on instrument response was determined. Changes in the morphology of fractal soot particles were monitored during coating and denuding processes and the effect of particle shape on instrument response was determined. The combination of optical and mass based measurements was used to determine the mass specific absorption coefficient for denuded soot particles. The single scattering albedo of the particles was also measured. An overview of the experiments and sample results are presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Aerosols, Climate, and the Hydrological Cycle
Ramanathan, V., Crutzen, P. J., Kiehl, J. T., & Rosenfeld, D. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1064034 · Cited by 3,831
Global and regional climate changes due to black carbon
Ramanathan, V., & Carmichael, G. (2008) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/ngeo156 · Cited by 3,616
Light Absorption by Carbonaceous Particles: An Investigative Review
Bond, T. C., & Bergstrom, R. W. (2006) · Aerosol Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/02786820500421521 · Cited by 2,980
Strong radiative heating due to the mixing state of black carbon in atmospheric aerosols
Jacobson, M. Z. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35055518 · Cited by 2,512
Kittelson, D. B. (1998) · Journal of Aerosol Science · doi:10.1016/s0021-8502(97)10037-4 · Cited by 2,289
Canagaratna, M. R., Jayne, J. T., Jimenez, J. L., Allan, J. D., Alfarra, M. R., Zhang, Q., Onasch, T. B., Drewnick, F., Coe, H., Middlebrook, A., et al. (2007) · Mass Spectrometry Reviews · doi:10.1002/mas.20115 · Cited by 1,846
Self-citationDevelopment of an Aerosol Mass Spectrometer for Size and Composition Analysis of Submicron Particles
Jayne, J. T., Leard, D. C., Zhang, X., Davidovits, P., Smith, K. A., Kolb, C. E., & Worsnop, D. R. (2000) · Aerosol Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/027868200410840 · Cited by 1,604
Self-citationDeCarlo, P., Slowik, J., Worsnop, D., Davidovits, P., & Jimenez, J. (2004) · Aerosol Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/02786826.2004.10399461 · Cited by 1,239
Self-citationHansen, A. D. A., Rosen, H., & Novakov, T. (1984) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/0048-9697(84)90265-1 · Cited by 1,081
Calibration and Intercomparison of Filter-Based Measurements of Visible Light Absorption by Aerosols
Bond, T. C., Anderson, T. L., & Campbell, D. (1999) · Aerosol Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/027868299304435 · Cited by 1,022
Cited by
Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific assessment
Bond, T. C., Doherty, S. J., Fahey, D. W., Forster, P. M., Berntsen, T., DeAngelo, B. J., Flanner, M. G., Ghan, S., Kärcher, B., Koch, D., et al. (2013) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1002/jgrd.50171 · Cited by 6,385
Self-citationMichelsen, H. A., Schulz, C., Smallwood, G. J., & Will, S. (2015) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2015.07.001 · Cited by 423
Wang, X., Heald, C. L., Ridley, D. A., Schwarz, J. P., Spackman, J. R., Perring, A. E., Coe, H., Liu, D., & Clarke, A. D. (2014) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-14-10989-2014 · Cited by 323
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Cross, E. S., Onasch, T. B., Ahern, A., Wrobel, W., Slowik, J. G., Olfert, J., Lack, D. A., Massoli, P., Cappa, C. D., Schwarz, J. P., Spackman, J. R., Fahey, D. W., Sedlacek, A., Trimborn, A., Jayne, J. T., Freedman, A., Williams, L. R., Ng, N. L., Mazzoleni, C., Dubey, M., Brem, B., Kok, G., Subramanian, R., Freitag, S., Clarke, A., Thornhill, D., Marr, L. C., Kolb, C. E., Worsnop, D. R., & Davidovits, P.
- Venue
- Aerosol Science and Technology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-06-30
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 592-611
- ISSN
- 0278-6826 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-7388
- OpenAlex
- W2118369265
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 55
- FWCI
- 12.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Soot Particle Studies—Instrument Inter-Comparison—Project Overview. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/02786826.2010.482113
- The paper
- Cross, E. S., Onasch, T. B., Ahern, A., Wrobel, W., Slowik, J. G., Olfert, J., Lack, D. A., Massoli, P., Cappa, C. D., Schwarz, J. P., Spackman, J. R., Fahey, D. W., Sedlacek, A., Trimborn, A., Jayne, J. T., Freedman, A., Williams, L. R., Ng, N. L., Mazzoleni, C., . . . Davidovits, P. (2010). Soot Particle Studies—Instrument Inter-Comparison—Project Overview. Aerosol Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2010.482113
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.