The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A collection of experimental data for aerosol monitoring cyclones
Open accessAbstract
Cyclone behavior is complex and difficult to model. Recent years have seen the development of new and better predictive models for cyclone performance, which are providing new insights into how cyclone performance is affected by cyclone geometry. Experimental data are essential for verification of such models. In this article we present a dataset of more than 250 experimental determinations of cyclone penetration. The dataset includes cyclones with a wide range of sizes and geometries, tested at a wide range of flow rates. We illustrate some empirical, semi-empirical and mathematical approaches to modeling these cyclone data. For our data, we show that mathematical modeling approaches developed for large gas-cleaning cyclones can also be applied to small aerosol monitoring cyclones, to diverse cyclone geometries, and laminar flow operating conditions.Copyright © Crown copyright
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Another study performed by Kenny et al. 10 studied over 250 different combinations of circular inlet cyclones at a wide range of flow rates to determine the cut size for particle separation. Several of their cyclone geometries had d50 cut rates below 1 µm.”
From Cyclone Sub-Micron Particulate Separator (2023) · cites this paper as [10]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 32
- ACGIH, 1998, Particle Size-Selective Sampling for Particulate Air Contaminants
- 10.1016/S0021-8502(03)00054-5 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.powtec.2012.10.058 · DOI
- 10.1080/01496395.2012.675003 · DOI
- 10.1021/es400023n · DOI
- 10.1093/annhyg/meu045 · DOI
- Comité Européen de Normalisation (CEN), 1993, Workplace atmospheres: Size fraction definitions for measurement of airborne particles in the workplace
- 10.1080/027868202753504461 · DOI
- Hoffman A. C., 2008, Gas cyclones and swirl tubes: Principles, design and operation
- 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2015.03.005 · DOI
- International Standards Organisation (ISO), 1995, Air Quality—Particle size fraction definitions for health-related sampling
- 10.1080/02786820500295560 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2013.01.010 · DOI
- 10.1080/02786826.2011.574174 · DOI
- 10.1039/b419001g · DOI
- 10.1016/S0021-8502(96)00455-7 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0021-8502(00)00047-1 · DOI
- 10.1080/027868200303669 · DOI
- 10.1080/027868290502290 · DOI
- 10.1093/annhyg/meq050 · DOI
- 10.1080/15459624.2016.1153804 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0021-8502(00)90279-9 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0021-8502(96)00479-X · DOI
- 10.1016/0021-8502(94)00131-H · DOI
- 10.1016/S0021-8502(99)00039-7 · DOI
- 10.1021/es00046a012 · DOI
- 10.1021/es950302e · DOI
- 10.1080/02786820119266 · DOI
- 10.5194/acp-15-2985-2015 · DOI
- 10.1021/es60159a016 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.powtec.2010.10.002 · DOI
- Tan F., 2016, Chem. Eng. Commun., 39, 576
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cyclone Sub-Micron Particulate Separator
Haggerty, M., Emmons, M., Wagner, A., & Cutbirth, M. (2023) · 52nd International Conference on Environmental Systems · doi:10.32865/2346/94808
Metadata
- Authors
- Kenny, L. C., Thorpe, A., & Stacey, P.
- Affiliations
- Health and Safety Executive (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Thorpe, A.
- Venue
- Aerosol Science and Technology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2017-07-06
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1190-1200
- ISSN
- 0278-6826 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-7388
- OpenAlex
- W2733270616
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 1.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Aerosol Science and Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Cyclone Separators and Fluid Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation
- Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes › Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows
- Keywords
- cyclone geometry, laminar flow, semi-empirical model, flow rate effects
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
