The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Psychological and Physiological Effects of MDMA on Normal Volunteers
Abstract
The experimental subjects were older than the average general population, more educated and considerably experienced in drug use. They considered themselves to have benefited by their MDMA experience, with no evidence of harm. There were moderate, consistent biochemical, cardiovascular and neurobehavioral changes within normal limits that peaked between one and two hours following ingestion, returning to predrug levels within 24 hours. This experimental situation produced no observed or reported psychological or physiological damage, either during the 24-hour study period or during the three-month follow-up period. While the subjects are not typical of the general population, the findings support the general impression among knowledgeable professionals that MDMA is reasonably safe, produces positive mood changes in users, does not cause negative problems (if used sparingly and episodically) and is without evidence of abuse. Certainly, any drug that causes ataxia, elevates blood pressure and pulse is potentially unsafe. One can say little about safety when effects and side effects are studied for only 24 hours and then a blood cytology is obtained after three months. In this study, safety must exclude long-term toxicity. Not enough is known about MDMA's long-range effects other than information from random anecdotal evidence supplied by a few clinicians plus self-reports by unselected and unsupervised users. From the information presented here, one can only say that MDMA, at the doses tested, has remarkably consistent and predictable psychological effects that are transient and free of clinically apparent major toxicity. The experimental subjects believed that MDMA is both safe and beneficial, but there is insufficient evidence to accurately judge either the drug's potential harm or benefit.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Vollenweider, F. X., Gamma, A., Liechti, M., & Huber, T. (1998) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/s0893-133x(98)00013-x · Cited by 448
Mas, M., Farré, M., de la Torre, R., Roset, P. N., Segura, J. O., & Camí, J. (1999) · The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/s0022-3565(24)34877-3 · Cited by 362
Ecstasy (MDMA) effects upon mood and cognition: before, during and after a Saturday night dance
Parrott, A. C., & Lasky, J. (1998) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s002130050714 · Cited by 340
(1988) · PubMed · Cited by 313
STEELE, T. D., McCANN, U. D., & RICAURTE, G. A. (1994) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1994.tb03330.x · Cited by 289
Metadata
- Authors
- Downing, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Psychoactive Drugs
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1986-10
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 335-340
- ISSN
- 0279-1072 (ISSN-L)
- 2159-9777
- OpenAlex
- W1974766709
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Psychological and Physiological Effects of MDMA on Normal Volunteers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/02791072.1986.10472366
- The paper
- Downing, J. (1986). The Psychological and Physiological Effects of MDMA on Normal Volunteers. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs. https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.1986.10472366
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.