Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,120

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS)

Wesson, Donald R., Ling, Walter·2003·Journal of Psychoactive Drugs

Abstract

The clinical opiate withdrawal scale (COWS) is a clinician-administered, pen and paper instrument that rates eleven common opiate withdrawal signs or symptoms. The summed score of the eleven items can be used to assess a patient's level of opiate withdrawal and to make inferences about their level of physical dependence on opioids. With increasing use of opioids for treatment of pain and the availability of sublingual buprenorphine in the United States for treatment of opioid dependence, clinical assessment of opiate withdrawal intensity has received renewed interest. Buprenorphine, a partial opiate agonist at the mu receptor, can precipitate opiate withdrawal in patients with a high level of opioid dependence who are not experiencing opioid withdrawal. Since development of the first opiate withdrawal scale in the mid-1930s, many different opioid withdrawal scales have been used in clinical and research settings. This article reviews the history of opiate withdrawal scales and the context of their initial use. A template version of the COWS that can be copied and used clinically is appended. PDF formatted versions of the COWS are also available from the websites of the American Society of Addiction Medicine, the California Society of Addiction Medicine, the UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs, and AlcoholMD.com.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02791072.2003.10400007

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. 10.1001/jama.1973.03220160036009 · doi:10.1001/jama.1973.03220160036009
  2. Blachly P. H., 1973, Proceedings of the National Conference on Methadone Treatment, 2, 1465
  3. 10.1056/NEJM197204272861718 · doi:10.1056/nejm197204272861718
  4. 10.1016/0376-8716(91)90059-8 · doi:10.1016/0376-8716(91)90059-8
  5. 10.1016/0376-8716(89)90078-1 · doi:10.1016/0376-8716(89)90078-1
  6. Wesson D. R., 1999, Buprenorphine in Pharmacotherapy of Opioid Addiction: Implementation in Office-Based Medical Practice; Translating the Experience of Clinical Trials into Clinical Practice.

Cited by

See all 1,120

Metadata

Authors
Wesson, D. R., & Ling, W.
Venue
Journal of Psychoactive Drugs
Published
2003-06-01
Volume
35
Issue
2
Pages
253-259
ISSN
  • 0279-1072 (ISSN-L)
  • 2159-9777
OpenAlex
W2018914766
Cited by
1,120
References
10
FWCI
7.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/02791072.2003.10400007
The paper
Wesson, D. R., & Ling, W. (2003). The Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS). Journal of Psychoactive Drugs. https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2003.10400007

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.