The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effective Academic Interventions in the United States: Evaluating and Enhancing the Acquisition of Early Reading Skills
Abstract
The alignment of assessment, intervention, and meaningful student outcomes is arguably one the most exciting developments in school psychology. This linkage is especially apparent in the areas of early literacy where the convergence of three areas of research and development form a dynamic process of information and feedback to enhance the effectiveness of interventions in preventing and remediating reading problems for children in early elementary grades. In this article, we develop the rationale for early and intensive literacy intervention, review the major implications of the converging evidence in early literacy and reading acquisition, and propose mechanisms to enhance early literacy development through the strategic and timely linkage of assessment and intervention. The major areas of convergence from research regarding what to teach and how to teach it are presented. The contributions and role of assessment information in developing and providing effective beginning reading and early literacy interventions are described.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Summarizing Trend in Student Achievement: A Comparison of Methods
Shinn, M. R., Good, R. H., & Stein, S. (1989) · School Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/02796015.1989.12085432 · Cited by 58
Self-citation
Cited by
Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills
(2018) · The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation · doi:10.4135/9781506326139.n214 · Cited by 1,051
Good, R. H., Simmons, D. C., & Kame'enui, E. J. (2001) · Scientific Studies of Reading · doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr0503_4 · Cited by 545
Self-citationWanzek, J., Vaughn, S., Wexler, J., Swanson, E. A., Edmonds, M., & Kim, A.-H. (2006) · Journal of Learning Disabilities · doi:10.1177/00222194060390060501 · Cited by 138
Linklater, D. L., O'Connor, R. E., & Palardy, G. J. (2009) · Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2009.08.001 · Cited by 40
A blueprint for data-based English reading literacy instructional decision-making
Nel, C. (2018) · South African Journal of Childhood Education · doi:10.4102/sajce.v8i1.528 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Good, R. H., Simmons, D. C., & Smith, S. B.
- Venue
- School Psychology Review
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1998-03-01
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 45-56
- ISSN
- 0279-6015 (ISSN-L)
- 2372-966X
- OpenAlex
- W128813866
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effective Academic Interventions in the United States: Evaluating and Enhancing the Acquisition of Early Reading Skills. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/02796015.1998.12085896
- The paper
- Good, R. H., Simmons, D. C., & Smith, S. B. (1998). Effective Academic Interventions in the United States: Evaluating and Enhancing the Acquisition of Early Reading Skills. School Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.1998.12085896
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.