Facial appearance in adults who had cleft lip and palate treated in childhood
Abstract
Sixty-eight adults (44 men and 24 women) with treated total cleft lip and palate were compared with a group of 66 adults (49 men and 17 women) without clefts, matched by sex and age. The outcome measures included a self-report questionnaire about body image, quality of life in general, health-related quality of life, somatisation, and depression. The group with clefts were also asked if they had further need of treatment. They reported significantly more dissatisfaction with their facial appearance (nose, lips, mouth, profile, and overall facial appearance) than the group without clefts. Satisfaction with facial appearance was significantly correlated with a better quality of life in both groups, and significantly correlated with a better health-related quality of life and a lower grade of somatisation in the group with clefts. Dissatisfaction with facial appearance was the most significant predictor of depression in both groups. A panel of four professionals from a cleft lip and palate treatment team judged the outcome of treatment in 64 of the subjects on colour slides. The professionals and the subjects with clefts were generally not very satisfied with the results of the surgical outcome. Thirty of the subjects with clefts (47%) wished to have more operations. The professional group recommended further operations in 38 of the cases (59%), in particular, rhinoplasties. We conclude that the subjects with treated clefts were not satisfied with their facial appearance, although they seem to be psychosocially well-adjusted to their disability.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Difficulties adjusting to an altered appearance can lead to anxiety, shame, reduced self-worth, social avoidance and isolation, which can significantly interfere with social, occupational and relational functioning, lowering quality of life for some individuals.
“Difficulties adjusting to an altered appearance can lead to anxiety, shame, reduced self-worth, social avoidance and isolation which can significantly interfere with social, occupational and relational functioning, lowering quality of life for some individuals [8-12].”
From The role of psychological flexibility in appearance anxiety in people who have experienced a visible burn injury. (2019) · cites this paper as [11]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 21 · Cited by 177
- Authors
- Marcusson, A., Paulin, G., & Östrup, L.
- Affiliations
- Linköping University Hospital (SE)
- ORCID
- Marcusson, Agneta
- Venue
- Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 16-23
- ISSN
- 0284-4311 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2096441392
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 0.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Cleft Lip and Palate Research
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
- Keywords
- cleft lip and palate, facial appearance, body image, health-related quality of life, somatization, depression, surgical outcomes, rhinoplasty, psychosocial adjustment
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Body Image, Cleft Lip, Cleft Palate, Depression, Facial Expression, Female, Humans, Male, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reoperation, Somatoform Disorders, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review