Understanding concentrated insulins: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
Abstract
Objective To compile, analyze, and summarize the literature on concentrated insulins (i.e. concentrations >100 units/mL) from randomized controlled trials and derive guidance on appropriate use of these agents. Methods Searches were conducted in Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Trialtrove (through April 2016) and ClinicalTrials.gov (through April 2017) for phase 1-4 clinical studies using concentrated insulins. Selected studies included multiple-arm, randomized controlled trials evaluating subcutaneously administered concentrated insulins. Trial registration numbers (selected studies) were searched in Medline, Embase and Google Scholar (through April 2017). Late-phase studies were graded using guidance from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Results Thirty-eight completed trials (7900 participants) and 34 qualifying publications were identified. Four marketed concentrated insulins were evaluated: two long-acting basal (insulin glargine 300 units/mL and insulin degludec 200 units/mL [IDeg200]), one rapid-acting prandial (insulin lispro 200 units/mL [ILis200]), and one prandial/basal (human regular insulin 500 units/mL). Early-phase trials established bioequivalence for IDeg200 and ILis200 with the corresponding 100 units/mL formulations. Efficacy studies showed noninferior glycemic control between comparators for long-acting basal and prandial/basal products with generally low severe hypoglycemia. Six additional concentrated ins…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
After the first clinical use of regular insulin, the pancreatic extract was further purified, the source moved to pork and later beef pancreas, and the concentration was increased from U-5 to U-10, U-20, U-40 and U-80 preparations.
“After the first clinical use of ‘regular’ insulin for patients, the pancreatic extract was further purified, the source of insulin moved to pork and later beef pancreas, and the concentration was increased from the original commercially available U-5 insulin (for example, 5 units ml−1) to U-10, U-20, U-40 and U-80 preparations105.”
From 100 years of insulin: celebrating the past, present and future of diabetes therapy (2021) · cites this paper as [105]
Cites
Bliss, M. (1982) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-09612-1 · Cited by 524 · see citing works
Clinical use of U-500 regular insulin: Review and meta-analysis
Reutrakul, S., Wroblewski, K., & Brown, R. L. (2012) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/193229681200600229 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Korsatko, S., Deller, S., Koehler, G., Mader, J. K., Neubauer, K., Adrian, C. L., Thomsen, H., Haahr, H., & Pieber, T. R. (2013) · Clinical Drug Investigation · doi:10.1007/s40261-013-0096-7 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Hood, R. C., Arakaki, R. F., Wysham, C., Li, Y. G., Settles, J. A., & Jackson, J. A. (2015) · Endocrine Practice · doi:10.4158/ep15612.or · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Self-citationWysham, C., Hood, R. C., Warren, M. L., Wang, T., Morwick, T. M., & Jackson, J. A. (2016) · Endocrine Practice · doi:10.4158/ep15959.or · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
100 years of insulin: celebrating the past, present and future of diabetes therapy
Sims, E. K., Carr, A. L. J., Oram, R. A., DiMeglio, L. A., & Evans-Molina, C. (2021) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-021-01418-2 · Cited by 270 · see citing works
The evolution of insulin and how it informs therapy and treatment choices
Hirsch, I. B., Juneja, R., Beals, J. M., Antalis, C. J., & Wright, E. E. (2020) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/endrev/bnaa015 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ovalle, F., Segal, A. R., Anderson, J. E., Cohen, M. R., Morwick, T. M., & Jackson, J. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
- Joslin Diabetes Center (US)
- The Frist Clinic, Nashville, TN, USA;
- Institute for Safe Medication Practices (US)
- Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ovalle, Fernando
- Venue
- Current Medical Research and Opinion
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2018-01-10
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1029-1043
- ISSN
- 0300-7995 (ISSN-L)
- 1473-4877
- OpenAlex
- W2770313980
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 0.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Current Medical Research and Opinion (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Eli Lilly and Company
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
- Keywords
- bioequivalence, glycemic control, hypoglycemia, diabetes treatment, long-acting basal insulin, prandial insulin
- MeSH terms
- Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Hypoglycemic Agents, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Insulins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review