Cited by 12Intensive Care Unit Cognitive DisordersSepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentBacterial Infections and Vaccines

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Combining biomarkers of BNIP3 L, S100B, NSE, and accessible measures to predict sepsis-associated encephalopathy: a prospective observational study

Zhang, Nannan, Xie, Keliang, Yang, Fei, Wang, Yunying, Yang, Xinhao, Zhao, Lina·2024·Current Medical Research and Opinion

Abstract

Background Accurate identification of delirium in sepsis patients is crucial for guiding clinical diagnosis and treatment. However, there are no accurate biomarkers and indicators at present. We aimed to identify which combinations of cognitive impairment-related biomarkers and other easily accessible assessments best predict delirium in sepsis patients. Methods One hundred and one sepsis patients were enrolled in a prospective study cohort. S100B, NSE, and BNIP3 L biomarkers were detected in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid and patients' optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD). The optimal biomarkers identified by Logistic regression are combined with other factors such as ONSD to filter out the perfect model to predict delirium in sepsis patients through Logistic regression, Naïve Bayes, decision tree, and neural network models. Main results Among all biomarkers, compared with BNIP3 L (AUC = .706, 95% CI = .597-.815) and NSE (AUC = .711, 95% CI = .609-.813) in cerebrospinal fluid, plasma S100B (AUC = .729, 95% CI = .626-.832) had the best discrimination performance for delirium in sepsis patients. Logistic regression analysis showed that the combination of cerebrospinal fluid BNIP3 L with plasma S100B, ONSD, neutrophils, and age provided the best discrimination to cognitive impairment in sepsis patients (accuracy = .901, specificity = .923, sensitivity = .911), which was better than Naïve Bayes, decision tree, and neural network models. Neutrophils, ONSD, and cerebrospinal fluid B…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03007995.2024.2322059

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. 10.1164/rccm.201504-0781OC · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1001/jama.1996.03530300054040 · DOI
  3. 10.1001/jama.2010.1553 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1007/s11064-014-1308-0 · DOI
  5. 10.1038/s41598-020-64200-3 · DOI
  6. 10.1093/bja/aem201 · DOI
  7. 10.1007/s11064-008-9907-2 · DOI
  8. 10.1177/0963689719840353 · DOI
  9. 10.1080/15548627.2020.1802089 · DOI
  10. 10.1080/15548627.2020.1848130 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2021.12.002 · DOI
  12. 10.1186/s13054-020-02959-7 · DOI
  13. 10.3233/JAD-160619 · DOI
  14. 10.1007/s00134-017-4807-z · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.3389/fmicb.2021.737066 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70120-6 · DOI
  17. 10.3390/e23121703 · DOI
  18. 10.1007/978-1-4419-7046-6_19 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.cub.2019.02.034 · DOI
  20. 10.3389/fncel.2022.788150 · DOI
  21. 10.29399/npa.23212 · DOI
  22. 10.1080/15548627.2017.1357792 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, N., Xie, K., Yang, F., Wang, Y., Yang, X., & Zhao, L.
Affiliations
  • Tianjin Medical University General Hospital (CN)
  • Chifeng Municipal Hospital (CN)
  • Medical Laboratory Technology, Ulanqab Medical College, Wulanchabu City, China
Corresponding author
Zhao, Lina
Venue
Current Medical Research and Opinion
Published
2024-03-05
Volume
40
Issue
4
Pages
575-582
ISSN
  • 0300-7995 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-4877
OpenAlex
W4392047588
Cited by
12
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3
FWCI
4.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Medical Research and Opinion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region (2022MS08002)
  • Technology Plan Project of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Health Commission (202202326)
  • Tianjin Municipal Health Commission (TJWJ2023QN007)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (82302413)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
Keywords
sepsis-associated encephalopathy, delirium, sepsis, BNIP3L, S100B, neuron-specific enolase, cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, plasma biomarkers, optic nerve sheath diameter, neutrophils, cognitive impairment, combined biomarker detection, prediction model
MeSH terms
Bayes Theorem, Delirium, Humans, Membrane Proteins, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, Biomarkers, Sepsis, S100 Calcium Binding Protein beta Subunit, Sepsis-Associated Encephalopathy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review