Cited by 41Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationWorkplace Health and Well-beingMedical Practices and Rehabilitation

Primary care patients with musculoskeletal pain

Atroshi, Isam, Andersson, Ingemar H., Gummesson, Christina, Leden, Ido, Odenbring, Sten, Ornstein, Ewald·2002·Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate long-term sick leave among primary care patients with musculoskeletal disorders and the predictive value of health-status and sense-of-coherence measures. METHODS: Patients aged 17 to 64 years who, during seven weeks, attended one of six primary care centers because of non-traumatic musculoskeletal pain and who completed the SF-36 health questionnaire and the sense of coherence (SOC) scale at baseline and after one year. RESULTS: Of 189 patients, 36 (19%) were sicklisted for at least three months before and/or after their visit; the most common diagnoses were non-specific soft-tissue or multiple joint, low back, and shoulder pain. The long-term sicklisted patients had significantly worse baseline SF-36 and SOC scores than the non-sicklisted patients; moderate improvement in the SF-36 bodily pain but no improvement in the physical functioning scores occurred. The duration of sick leave at baseline and the SF-36 bodily pain score were significant predictors of continuos one-year work disability. CONCLUSION: Long-term sick leave was common among primary care patients with musculoskeletal pain. The physical functioning and return-to-work outcomes after one year were poor. The SF-36 bodily pain scale might be helpful in identifying at risk patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/030097402320318440

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 10 · Cited by 41

Authors
Atroshi, I., Andersson, I. H., Gummesson, C., Leden, I., Odenbring, S., & Ornstein, E.
Affiliations
Department of Orthopedics, HaEssleholm-Kristianstad Hospitals, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine and Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Kristianstad Hospital, Kristianstad, Sweden
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology
Published
2002-01
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
239-244
ISSN
  • 0300-9742 (ISSN-L)
  • 1502-7732
OpenAlex
W1808770643
Cited by
41
References
10
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
Keywords
musculoskeletal pain, sick leave, work disability, sense of coherence, SF-36 bodily pain, physical function, return to work, low back pain, shoulder pain, soft tissue pain, primary care patients, risk prediction
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Disability Evaluation, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Predictive Value of Tests, Primary Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Class, Sick Leave

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review