The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mapping Aijaz Ahmad’s intellectual legacy: a thorough expedition
Abstract
This article examines the intellectual legacy of Aijaz Ahmad, primarily through the insightful dialogues conducted by Vijay Prashad. It comprehensively investigates and highlights Aijaz Ahmad’s significant contributions, with a particular focus on his main ideological positions. Drawing from a multitude of sources, this work enriches our understanding of Ahmad’s profound impact on the existing body of knowledge. Ahmad’s exceptional analytical proficiency shines through in his critical assessments of imperialism and his active engagement with postcolonial discourse. Through the judicious application of an interdisciplinary approach, this comprehensive work serves to encapsulate the intricate and multifaceted nature of Aijaz Ahmad’s intellectual legacy, resolutely cementing his stature as a preeminent luminary and influential commentator within the realm of academia.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Still being checked.
Metadata
- Authors
- Bhat, W. A., Majid, S., & Mir, B. A.
- Venue
- Critique
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2023-07-03
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 237-250
- ISSN
- 0301-7605 (ISSN-L)
- 1748-8605
- OpenAlex
- W4391746150
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Critique (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Decolonial Thought and Epistemologies
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Cultural Studies and Colonialism
- Keywords
- Aijaz Ahmad, intellectual legacy, critical theory, imperialism, postcolonial discourse, postcolonialism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
