Cited by 9Infant Development and Preterm CareIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

He Tamariki Kokoti Tau: Whānau of preterm Māori infants (pēpi) reflect on their journeys from birth to first birthday

Open access
Adcock, Anna, Cram, Fiona, Edmonds, Liza, Lawton, Beverley·2022·Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand

Abstract

ABSTRACT An infant arriving early disrupts the birth imaginary of whānau (family collectives) and situates them in unfamiliar health environments that may not be culturally safe. Regaining a sense of familiarity enables whānau to cope with their unexpected preterm trajectory. He Tamariki Kokoti Tau: Babies Born Prematurely was the first Kaupapa Māori prospective qualitative longitudinal study to explore these trajectories, walking alongside whānau from birth to first birthday. This interpretative phenomenological analysis explores the final ‘first birthday’ interviews with 16 whānau. Concerns that had been raw in early days of neonatal intensive care carried over – frustrating whānau yet strengthening their resolve to support each other. Whānau described how they enacted resilience together, with their whānau collective including health practitioner champions who became ‘like whānau’ by virtue of their culturally responsive care. While pēpi (infants) continued to experience health issues, whānau felt hopeful for the year ahead. They expressed love, joy, and pride for their pēpi as the centre of their whānau. Whānau are experts of their pēpi, and healthcare champions who recognise this and promote whānau tino‐rangatiratanga (autonomy) make a world of difference. Health services can learn from these whānau, about how to better support preterm care pathways for Māori.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03036758.2022.2090390

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 26 · Cited by 9

Authors
Adcock, A., Cram, F., Edmonds, L., & Lawton, B.
Affiliations
  • Victoria University of Wellington (NZ)
  • Katoa Ltd. Auckland New Zealand
  • University of Otago (NZ)
Corresponding author
Adcock, Anna
Venue
Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-06-29
Volume
52
Issue
S1
Pages
57-74
ISSN
  • 0303-6758 (ISSN-L)
  • 1175-8899
OpenAlex
W4283718056
Cited by
9
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Health Research Council of New Zealand (16/444)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
preterm infants, Māori families, whānau, infant development, first birthday, neonatal intensive care, culturally responsive care, family resilience, family-centered care, Kaupapa Māori research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review