Insightful learning in the laboratory: Some experiences from 10 years of designing and using conceptual labs
Open accessAbstract
This paper describes a series of projects on the design and implementation of ‘conceptual labs’ aimed at developing insightful learning, following work that began in 1994/1995. The main focus has been on courses in mechanics and electric circuit theory. The approach taken in designing these innovative curricula can be described as ‘design-based research’. A common feature in these learning environments is the use of technology as a tool to aid students’ inquiry. In addition, systematic variation, based on the theory of variation, has been introduced into the design of the assigned tasks. Results from conceptual inventories have demonstrated the success of conceptual labs. In the later projects, video recording was used to study students’ courses of action in labs. This paper describes how these studies have provided insights into conditions that are critical for learning and how these insights have helped the present author and his co-workers make further improvements to learning environments.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Being able to focus on the experiment at hand and comprehend its critical features is an important prerequisite for successful learning.
“Being able to focus on the experiment at hand and comprehend its critical features is an important prerequisite for successful learning [5].”
Cites
Hestenes, D., Wells, M., & Swackhamer, G. (1992) · The Physics Teacher · doi:10.1119/1.2343497 · Cited by 3,235 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Makransky, G., Thisgaard, M. W., & Gadegaard, H. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0155895 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bernhard, J.
- Affiliations
- Linköping University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Bernhard, J.
- ORCID
- Bernhard, J.
- Venue
- European Journal of Engineering Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-04-28
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 271-287
- ISSN
- 0304-3797 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-5898
- OpenAlex
- W2005633135
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 21.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- urn.kb.se
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- European Journal of Engineering Education (publishedVersion)
- KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Experimental Learning in Engineering
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Architecture › Engineering Education and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- insight learning, physics education, mechanics, circuit theory, variation theory, systematic variation, design-based research, inquiry-based learning, curriculum development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review