The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Critical thinking in the university curriculum – the impact on engineering education
Abstract
Critical thinking is a graduate attribute that many courses, including engineering courses, claim to produce in students. As a graduate attribute it is seen by academics as a particularly desirable outcome of student learning and is said by researchers to be a defining characteristic of university education. However, how critical thinking is understood and defined varies quite significantly between disciplines. The paper describes a series of in-depth, semi-structured interviews with academics involved in teaching and learning in a number of disciplines, including engineering. The objective of these interviews is to look at how different disciplines define critical thinking and how they teach critical thinking in their courses. The paper also describes how an analysis of student work and module descriptors has led to the development of a model of critical thinking that can be used across disciplines.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The inclusion of Ahern, et al. [24] in the review, despite the 2016-2025 scope, is justified because it provides a foundational Critical Thinking Model that remains relevant in higher education research.”
From Systematic literature review on critical thinking in higher education (2025) · cites this paper as [24]
Citations
Cites
Understanding What We Mean by the Generic Attributes of Graduates
Barrie, S. C. (2006) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-004-6384-7 · Cited by 662
Social realism, knowledge and the sociology of education : coalitions of the mind
Maton, K., & Moore, R. (2010) · Cited by 252
Cumulative and segmented learning: exploring the role of curriculum structures in knowledge‐building
Maton, K. (2009) · British Journal of Sociology of Education · doi:10.1080/01425690802514342 · Cited by 218
Undergraduates' experiences of critical thinking
*, V. P., & Bond, C. (2004) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/0729436042000235409 · Cited by 122
Multiplicities or Manna from Heaven? Critical Thinking and the Disciplinary Context
Jones, A. (2007) · Australian Journal of Education · doi:10.1177/000494410705100107 · Cited by 71
Cited by
Promoting creativity and innovation in engineering education.
Cropley, D. H. (2015) · Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts · doi:10.1037/aca0000008 · Cited by 244
Harvey, A., & Russell-Mundine, G. (2018) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2018.1508131 · Cited by 102
Andreucci-Annunziata, P., Riedemann, A., Cortés, S., Mellado, A., del Río, M. T., & Vega-Muñoz, A. (2023) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2023.1141686 · Cited by 161
Davison, L., Ahern, A., & Hine, J. P. (2015) · Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.trd.2015.04.028 · Cited by 62
Self-citationGrandón, G. F., & García, F. (2016) · Revista de la Educación Superior · doi:10.1016/j.resu.2016.06.004 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Ahern, A., O'Connor, T., McRuairc, G., McNamara, M., & O'Donnell, D.
- Affiliations
- University College Dublin (IE)
- b School Nursing, Midwifery and Health Sciences , University College Dublin , Ireland
- Corresponding author
- Ahern, A.
- Venue
- European Journal of Engineering Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2012-03-08
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 125-132
- ISSN
- 0304-3797 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-5898
- OpenAlex
- W2047600110
- Cited by
- 82
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 20.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of Engineering Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Education and Critical Thinking Development
- Social Sciences › Education › Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
- Keywords
- critical thinking, engineering education, graduate competencies, higher education curriculum, disciplinary differences, student work analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
