The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The World Religion Dataset, 1945–2010: Logic, Estimates, and Trends
Abstract
This study introduces a new dataset on world religions. The World Religion Project consists of (a) a systematically developed classification of major world religions and religious families within major world religions, which enabled (b) the collection of data on the distribution of the population of all states in the international system across these religious categories, over the period of 1945–2010, and (c) a set of methods to reconcile among conflicting data from multiple sources, to deal with missing data, and to integrate multiple figures for a given observation. In the present study we discuss the significance of the World Religion Project, its internal logic and the development of the religion tree system of classification, and the data collection and data management process. We then provide a number of descriptive statistics about national, dyadic, regional, and global distributions of world religions, as well as some preliminary relationships between the religious similarity of states and their regime type, alliance patterns, and propensity to conflict. We discuss the potential contribution of this dataset to the study of the relationship between religion and international conflict and cooperation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War
FEARON, J. D., & LAITIN, D. D. (2003) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055403000534 · Cited by 7,366
Cited by
Does financial literacy improve financial inclusion? Cross country evidence
Grohmann, A., Klühs, T., & Menkhoff, L. (2018) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.06.020 · Cited by 699
Guldi, J., & Armitage, D. (2014) · doi:10.1017/9781139923880 · Cited by 464
Does Religion Affect Economic Growth and Happiness? Evidence from Ramadan *
Campante, F., & Yanagizawa-Drott, D. (2015) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjv002 · Cited by 334
HIV/AIDS, life expectancy, and the opportunity cost model of civil war
Kustra, T. (2017) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/0022002716628281 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Maoz, Z., & Henderson, E. A.
- Venue
- International Interactions
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-07
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 265-291
- ISSN
- 0305-0629 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7444
- OpenAlex
- W2000017811
- Cited by
- 278
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 54.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The World Religion Dataset, 1945–2010: Logic, Estimates, and Trends. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/03050629.2013.782306
- The paper
- Maoz, Z., & Henderson, E. A. (2013). The World Religion Dataset, 1945–2010: Logic, Estimates, and Trends. International Interactions. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050629.2013.782306
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.