The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Shuffled frog-leaping algorithm: a memetic meta-heuristic for discrete optimization
Abstract
A memetic meta-heuristic called the shuffled frog-leaping algorithm (SFLA) has been developed for solving combinatorial optimization problems. The SFLA is a population-based cooperative search metaphor inspired by natural memetics. The algorithm contains elements of local search and global information exchange. The SFLA consists of a set of interacting virtual population of frogs partitioned into different memeplexes. The virtual frogs act as hosts or carriers of memes where a meme is a unit of cultural evolution. The algorithm performs simultaneously an independent local search in each memeplex. The local search is completed using a particle swarm optimization-like method adapted for discrete problems but emphasizing a local search. To ensure global exploration, the virtual frogs are periodically shuffled and reorganized into new memplexes in a technique similar to that used in the shuffled complex evolution algorithm. In addition, to provide the opportunity for random generation of improved information, random virtual frogs are generated and substituted in the population.The algorithm has been tested on several test functions that present difficulties common to many global optimization problems. The effectiveness and suitability of this algorithm have also been demonstrated by applying it to a groundwater model calibration problem and a water distribution system design problem. Compared with a genetic algorithm, the experimental results in terms of the likelihood of convergence to a global optimal solution and the solution speed suggest that the SFLA can be an effective tool for solving combinatorial optimization problems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Simplex Method for Function Minimization
Nelder, J. A., & Mead, R. (1965) · The Computer Journal · doi:10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308 · Cited by 28,905
A new optimizer using particle swarm theory
Eberhart, R., & Kennedy, J. (2002) · MHS'95. Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science · doi:10.1109/mhs.1995.494215 · Cited by 16,067
Hopfield, J. J. (1984) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.81.10.3088 · Cited by 6,918
Cited by
Hippopotamus optimization algorithm: a novel nature-inspired optimization algorithm
Amiri, M. H., Mehrabi Hashjin, N., Montazeri, M., Mirjalili, S., & Khodadadi, N. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-54910-3 · Cited by 718
Rajwar, K., Deep, K., & Das, S. (2023) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-023-10470-y · Cited by 687
Bio inspired computing – A review of algorithms and scope of applications
Kar, A. K. (2016) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2016.04.018 · Cited by 578
Abdmouleh, Z., Gastli, A., Ben-Brahim, L., Haouari, M., & Al-Emadi, N. A. (2017) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2017.05.087 · Cited by 508
Modified Grey Wolf Optimizer for Global Engineering Optimization
Mittal, N., Singh, U., & Sohi, B. S. (2016) · Applied Computational Intelligence and Soft Computing · doi:10.1155/2016/7950348 · Cited by 389
Metadata
- Authors
- Eusuff, M., Lansey, K., & Pasha, F.
- Venue
- Engineering Optimization
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-03
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 129-154
- ISSN
- 0305-215X (ISSN-L)
- 1029-0273
- OpenAlex
- W2038411763
- Cited by
- 1,185
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 12.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Shuffled frog-leaping algorithm: a memetic meta-heuristic for discrete optimization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/03052150500384759
- The paper
- Eusuff, M., Lansey, K., & Pasha, F. (2006). Shuffled frog-leaping algorithm: a memetic meta-heuristic for discrete optimization. Engineering Optimization. https://doi.org/10.1080/03052150500384759
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.