Cited by 60Education, Achievement, and GiftednessStudent Stress and CopingSchool Choice and Performance

Test anxiety: Is it associated with performance in high-stakes examinations?

Open access
Jerrim, John·2023·Oxford Review of Education

Abstract

A long-established literature has found that anxiety about testing is negatively related to academic achievement. Yet there remains some debate as to whether this is simply due to less academically able pupils being more likely to develop education-related anxiety issues. This paper presents new evidence on this matter, focusing upon how test anxiety – as measured by five questions included in the PISA 2015 survey – is related to the grades 15/16-year-olds achieve in England’s high-stakes GCSE examinations. I find little evidence that teenagers with low or high levels of test anxiety achieve lower GCSE grades than pupils with average levels of test anxiety. Thus, in contrast to much of the existing literature, no clear relationship between test anxiety and examination performance is found.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03054985.2022.2079616

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For other students, anxiety can have serious consequences on assessment outcomes due to worry, procrastination and an inability to concentrate.

    “For other students, anxiety can have serious consequences on assessment outcomes due to worry, procrastination and an inability to concentrate (Jerrim, 2023).”

    From Replacing Traditional Written Laboratory Reports with Interactive Oral Assessments: Enhancing Laboratory Skill Assessment in Undergraduate Genetics Education (2026) · cites this paper as Jerrim, 2023

    The available passages from the Results and Conclusions contain only section headings, not findings. Searches for procrastination and for anxiety-related effects on examination performance returned no substantive passage addressing the claimed consequences or mechanisms, so our copy cannot verify the sentence. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Jerrim, J.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Jerrim, John
Venue
Oxford Review of Education
Published
2022-06-14
Volume
49
Issue
3
Pages
321-341
ISSN
  • 0305-4985 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3915
OpenAlex
W4282925035
Cited by
60
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 6
FWCI
9.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Oxford Review of Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council (ES/T003677/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
Keywords
test anxiety, exam performance, high-stakes examinations, GCSE, academic performance, PISA 2015, adolescents, academic anxiety, achievement gap

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review