The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Vygotsky, Tutoring and Learning
Abstract
This paper starts with a selective examination of research into individualised tutoring. We articulate theoretical and empirical evidence to support the conclusion that a set of common principles governs such tutoring. These principles apply to the provision of tutorial support for preschool aged children through to adult learners in a number of domains. In support of these claims, we bring together and relate research and theory from both face to‐face teaching and computer‐based tutoring situations. However, we also try to articulate some of the limits of our current knowledge. We suggest that the principles identified apply mainly to procedural learning in well‐structured domains. We examine the idea that other learning goals, such as the development of skills in self‐regulation, need to be derived from a different model of the learning process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
THE ROLE OF TUTORING IN PROBLEM SOLVING *
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x · Cited by 8,851
Self-citationApprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development in Social Context
Rogoff, B. (1990) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195059731.001.0001 · Cited by 4,709
Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the Crafts of Reading, Writing, and Mathematics
Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (2018) · Knowing, Learning, and Instruction · doi:10.4324/9781315044408-14 · Cited by 3,674
The 2 Sigma Problem: The Search for Methods of Group Instruction as Effective as One-to-One Tutoring
BLOOM, B. S. (1984) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x013006004 · Cited by 2,734
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- Anderson J.A., 1993, Rules of the Mind
- 10.2307/1175554 · doi:10.2307/1175554 · Paper page
- 10.1159/000418984 · DOI · Paper page
- Collins A., 1989, Knowing, Learning and Instruction: Essays in Honor of Robert Glaser, 453
- Greer B., 1992, Handbook of Research on Learning and Teaching Mathematics
- 10.1016/0022-0965(87)90060-9 · DOI
- Kaput J.J., 1992, Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 167
- 10.1016/0013-4694(89)90046-1 · DOI
- Rogoff B., 1986, The Contexts of School‐Based Literacy
- Rogoff B., 1984, Children's Learning in the ‘Zone of Proximal Development’
- 10.1159/000418977 · DOI
- 10.1080/1049482900010104 · DOI · Paper page
- Vygotsky L.S., 1978, Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes
- 10.1177/016502547800100203 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Instructional Scaffolding: Foundations and Evolving Definition
Belland, B. R. (2017) · Instructional Scaffolding in STEM Education · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-02565-0_2 · Cited by 40
Pupil voice and attitudes to music during the transition to secondary school
Kokotsaki, D. (2017) · British Journal of Music Education · doi:10.1017/s0265051716000279 · Cited by 18
Dumaru, P., & Al-Ameen, M. N. (2025) · Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713548 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Wood, D., & Wood, H.
- Venue
- Oxford Review of Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1996-03
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-16
- ISSN
- 0305-4985 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-3915
- OpenAlex
- W1984009993
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 10.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.