The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effective Teaching and Learning: scaffolding revisited
Open accessAbstract
Education has taken on board the concepts of ‘scaffolding’ and ‘Zone of Proximal Development’ because embedded within them is a psycho‐social model of teaching and learning. In this paper these concepts are examined in schooling contexts rather than those of everyday life. A first section outlines the ideas of the American socio‐cultural school, for example, Cole, Lave, Rogoff etc. and their link with the work of Vygotsky. Three sections are then devoted to a brief appraisal of the work of researchers who have been particularly concerned with scaffolding and schooling: Newman, Griffin and Cole; Tharp and Gallimore, and Wood on effective learning through scaffolding and contingent control. Section 7 is devoted to our research which sets out to explore and identify scaffolding strategies in three specific primary schooling contexts: design and technology, mathematics and science. We show the difficulty of scaffolding specialist knowledge and analyse the reasons for the absence of scaffolding in the classrooms observed. The last two sections set out our ideas on the differences between scaffolding everyday knowledge and specialist knowledge.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vygotsky, L. S. (1964) · Bulletin of the Orton Society · doi:10.1007/bf02928399 · Cited by 20,704
THE ROLE OF TUTORING IN PROBLEM SOLVING *
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x · Cited by 8,851
Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics and Culture in Everyday Life
Lave, J. (1988) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609268 · Cited by 5,148
Cited by
Discourse Patterns and Collaborative Scientific Reasoning in Peer and Teacher-Guided Discussions
Hogan, K., Nastasi, B. K., & Pressley, M. (1999) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1704_2 · Cited by 460
van de Pol, J., Volman, M., Oort, F., & Beishuizen, J. (2015) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-015-9351-z · Cited by 220
Content-area teachers and scaffolded instruction for English language learners
Pawan, F. (2008) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2008.02.003 · Cited by 83
Faculty members’ use of artificial intelligence to grade student papers: a case of implications
Kumar, R. (2023) · International Journal for Educational Integrity · doi:10.1007/s40979-023-00130-7 · Cited by 78
Scaffolding Science Teachers in Open‐inquiry Teaching
van der Valk, T., & de Jong, O. (2009) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500690802287155 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- Bliss, J., Askew, M., & Macrae, S.
- Venue
- Oxford Review of Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1996-03
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 37-61
- ISSN
- 0305-4985 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-3915
- OpenAlex
- W2144681576
- Cited by
- 199
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 3.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.