The Influence of Pupil Perceptions on Subject Choice at 14+ in Geography and History
Abstract
This article draws on the findings of a questionnaire inquiry into the factors influencing pupils' uptake of history and geography at GCSE. It argues that although many pupils enjoyed their learning at Key Stage 3 and that each subject holds some intrinsic interest in its own right, many pupils believe that there is relatively little purpose in pursuing the subjects beyond this stage. Their understanding of the relative 'usefulness' of both history and geography in their future lives is limited to direct and naive reference to forms of employment. Their understanding of the wider contribution each can make to their future lives is disappointingly uninformed. This limited understanding has an impact upon option decisions: if pupils cannot perceive any short term and longer term appreciation of the value of each subject then they are unlikely to want to pursue it in further study.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Prior research found that enjoyment is often not a good enough reason for a student to continue a subject at KS4, with the usefulness of a school subject playing a more important role in decision-making.
“Adey and Biddulph (2001) and others (e.g.Little, 2009) found, however, that such enjoyment is often not a good enough reason for a student to continue a subject at KS4, with the 'usefulness' of a school subject playing a more important role in the decision-making process.”
From Enjoyment of music and GCSE uptake: survey findings from three North East schools in England (2024) · cites this paper as Adey and Biddulph (2001)
The view that future career goals can have a negative impact on GCSE choices echoes findings in previous studies.
“This view about how future career goals can have a negative impact on GCSE choices, echoes findings in a number of previous studies (Lamont and Maton, 2008;Adey and Biddulph, 2001;Little, 2009).”
From Enjoyment of music and GCSE uptake: survey findings from three North East schools in England (2024) · cites this paper as Adey and Biddulph, 2001
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Enjoyment of music and GCSE uptake: survey findings from three North East schools in England
Whitford, H., & Kokotsaki, D. (2024) · British Journal of Music Education · doi:10.1017/s0265051723000438 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Adey, K., & Biddulph, M.
- ORCID
- Biddulph, Mary
- Venue
- Educational Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2001-12
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 439-450
- ISSN
- 0305-5698 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-3400
- OpenAlex
- W2084935698
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 3.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Educational Studies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Geography Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
- Keywords
- student perceptions, participant selection, geography, history, GCSE, Key Stage 3
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review