Cited by 26EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningDiscourse Analysis in Language StudiesEvaluation of Teaching Practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Writing centre tutoring sessions: Addressing students' concerns

Abstract

The guiding principle behind university writing centres is to focus on the process of writing rather than the finished product, prioritising higher order concerns related to organisation and argumentation of texts rather than lower order concerns of grammar and punctuation. Using survey-based data, this paper examines students’ concerns regarding written texts in English and analyses whether there is a correlation between students’ and peer-tutors’ perceptions of help received/provided in the writing centre at Nanyang Technological University. The aggregate findings show that there is a significant correlation between their perceptions but a further sub-analysis that pairs individual student and peer-tutor responses reveals that there are discrepancies between their perceptions of the type of help received and provided. These findings not only reveal the type of feedback students prefer, whether global or local, but also whether there is a good fit between student needs and tutoring approach based on students’ nationality and English proficiency.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03055698.2016.1193476

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Baleghizadeh S., and M. Yousefpoori-Naeim., 2013, E-International Journal of Educational Research, 4, 27
  2. Bell D. C., 2008, Learning Assistance Review, 13, 17
  3. Bell D. C., 2006, The Writing Center Journal, 26, 31
  4. 10.1080/09658410508668817 · DOI
  5. 10.5539/elt.v1n1p19 · DOI
  6. 10.1017/S026607840800014X · DOI
  7. 10.1017/S0266078412000223 · DOI
  8. 10.1111/weng.2014.33.issue-3 · DOI
  9. Clark I., 2001, The Writing Centre Journal, 22, 33
  10. 10.1093/elt/ccm042 · DOI
  11. Gillespie P., 2000, The Allyn and Bacon Guide to Peer Tutoring
  12. 10.1080/18334105.2014.11082029 · DOI
  13. Hedengren M., 2014, Praxis: A Writing Center Journal, 11, 1
  14. 10.1016/j.jslw.2005.12.001 · DOI
  15. Kachru Braj B., 1992, The Other Tongue: English across Cultures
  16. LaClare E., 2013, Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 4, 5, 10.37237/040102 · DOI
  17. Larson K. R., 2014, TEFLIN Journal, 25, 122, 10.15639/teflinjournal.v25i1/122-138 · DOI
  18. 10.1111/flan.1991.24.issue-3 · DOI
  19. 10.1109/TPC.2004.840485 · DOI
  20. Mackiewicz J., 2014, Composition Studies, 42, 54
  21. McKinley J., 2010, Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 1, 17, 10.37237/010104 · DOI
  22. 10.18806/tesl.v30i2.1142 · DOI
  23. 10.2307/377047 · DOI
  24. 10.1075/veaw · DOI
  25. 10.1080/09500782.2013.873805 · DOI
  26. Raymond L., 2012, The Writing Center Journal, 32, 64, 10.7771/2832-9414.1855 · DOI
  27. 10.3102/0034654307309920 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1111/weng.2014.33.issue-3 · DOI
  29. 10.1177/0741088309342364 · DOI
  30. Thompson I., 2014, The Writing Center Journal, 33, 37, 10.7771/2832-9414.1767 · DOI
  31. 10.1002/j.1949-3533.2003.tb00115.x · DOI
  32. 10.1017/S0266078412000235 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Winder, R., Kathpalia, S. S., & Koo, S. L.
Affiliations
Nanyang Technological University (SG)
Corresponding author
Winder, Roger
Venue
Educational Studies
Published
2016-06-10
Volume
42
Issue
4
Pages
323-339
ISSN
  • 0305-5698 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3400
OpenAlex
W2417409931
Cited by
26
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3
FWCI
8.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Educational Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
Keywords
peer tutoring, student concerns, writing process, text structure, argumentation, English as a second language, English proficiency, student nationality, writing support services

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review