Cited by 26African history and culture studiesLegal and cultural studies analysisAfrican Studies and Ethnography

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

‘European courts protect women and witches’: colonial law courts as redistributors of power in Swaziland 1920–1950

Booth, Alan R.·1992·Journal of Southern African Studies

Abstract

The imposition of colonial law on Swaziland by the British administration in 1907 led to a reallocation of power among various elements and groupings of traditional Swazi citizenry. The main beneficiaries were young, educated women who resorted to the colonial courts for protection against the discriminatory justice of traditional chiefs' courts in matters of physical and sexual abuse, and of forced marriage. Among the greatest losers were those individuals practising forms of ritual specialisation, principally healers and diviners, both of whom were looked upon indiscriminately by the colonial authorities as practitioners of ‘witchcraft’ and as consequent threats to civilised practises and to their own jurisdiction. To the degree that many of these practitioners were female, the access of Swazi women to this means of independence and upward mobility in a markedly sexually exploitative society was blocked. Likewise, to the degree that chiefs, whose overall powers had been severely truncated by the imposition of the colonial court system, derived power from their symbiotic associations with ritual specialists, they too suffered a further diminution of power. Chiefs' opposition to legal suppression of ritual practitioners was however couched mainly in terms of the dangers posed by evil‐doers loose in the land unchecked by diviners whose powers had been shorn by colonial proclamation, an argument to which the administration remained unsympathetic.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03057079208708314

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • During colonial times women resorted to colonial courts for protection against the discriminatory justice of traditional chiefs' courts in matters of physical abuse, sexual abuse, and forced marriage.

    “There is substantial evidence that during colonial times women resorted to colonial courts for protection against the discriminatory justice of traditional chiefs' courts in matters of physical abuse, sexual abuse, and forced marriage ( Booth 1992; ­ Jean-Baptiste 2007 ) .”

    From Legal Origins and Female HIV (2018) · cites this paper as Booth 1992

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Kuper ,An African Aristocracy: Rank Among the Swazi( London , 1947 ), pp. 161n ; pp. 173 – 176
  2. Kuper ,African Aristocracy, pp. 165 – 166
  3. Kuper ,African Aristocracy, pp. 165 – 166
  4. Booth Alan R., 1990, Paper presented at the African Studies Association Conference, 25
  5. Kuper ,African Aristocracy, pp. 161 – 162
  6. Mann Kristin, 1991, Law in Colonial Africa
  7. Crush Jonathan, 1987, The Struggle for Swazi Labour, 1890–1920, 10.1515/9780773561182 · DOI
  8. Isaacman Allen, 1990, African Studies Review, 41
  9. Hilda Kuper ,The Uniform of Colour: A Study of White‐Black Relationships in Swaziland( Johannesburg , 1947 ), pp. 64 , 69
  10. Alice K. Armstrong ,Legal Aspects of Land Tenure in Swaziland( Mbabane , 1986 ), pp. 1 – 2
  11. Rubin N.N., 1965, Journal of African Law
  12. Fannin J.M.A., 1967, Principles of Swazi Customary Law
  13. Marwick ,The Swazi, pp. 124 – 25
  14. Kuper ,African Aristocracy, pp. 172 – 176
  15. Marwick Brian, The Swazi, 195
  16. Kuper ,The Swazi, pp. 71 – 76
  17. 10.2307/1158048 · DOI
  18. Crush ,Struggle for Swazi Labour, pp. 29 – 30
  19. Crush ,Struggle for Swazi Labour, pp. 29 – 30
  20. 10.1017/CBO9780511563027 · DOI
  21. Marwick ,The Swazi, pp. 205 , 211
  22. Pim A., 1932, Report on the Financial and Economic Situation of Swaziland
  23. Bonner ,Kings, Commoners and Concessionaries, pp. 26 , 51 , 85 , 105 , 160 – 162
  24. Native Affairs Department, Transvaal Colony, 1907, The Laws and Statutes of the Transvaal Specially Related to the Native Population of the Transvaal
  25. Booth , ‘Political Economy of Law’ , pp. 42 – 44
  26. Booth ,Swaziland, pp. 15 – 23
  27. 10.2307/218373 · DOI
  28. Crush ,Struggle for Swazi Labour, pp. 19 – 32 , 77 – 78 , 162 – 63 , 191 – 93 , 206 – 07

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Booth, A. R.
Affiliations
Ohio University (US)
Corresponding author
Booth, Alan R.
Venue
Journal of Southern African Studies
Published
1992-06
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
253-275
ISSN
  • 0305-7070 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3893
OpenAlex
W2074245072
Cited by
26
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Southern African Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › African history and culture studies
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Legal and cultural studies analysis
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › African Studies and Ethnography
Keywords
Swaziland, witchcraft, ritual specialists, legal protection of women, power redistribution, colonial justice, sexual abuse, forced marriage, British colonial rule, gender and law

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review