The DOI matches its Crossref record.
‘European courts protect women and witches’: colonial law courts as redistributors of power in Swaziland 1920–1950
Abstract
The imposition of colonial law on Swaziland by the British administration in 1907 led to a reallocation of power among various elements and groupings of traditional Swazi citizenry. The main beneficiaries were young, educated women who resorted to the colonial courts for protection against the discriminatory justice of traditional chiefs' courts in matters of physical and sexual abuse, and of forced marriage. Among the greatest losers were those individuals practising forms of ritual specialisation, principally healers and diviners, both of whom were looked upon indiscriminately by the colonial authorities as practitioners of ‘witchcraft’ and as consequent threats to civilised practises and to their own jurisdiction. To the degree that many of these practitioners were female, the access of Swazi women to this means of independence and upward mobility in a markedly sexually exploitative society was blocked. Likewise, to the degree that chiefs, whose overall powers had been severely truncated by the imposition of the colonial court system, derived power from their symbiotic associations with ritual specialists, they too suffered a further diminution of power. Chiefs' opposition to legal suppression of ritual practitioners was however couched mainly in terms of the dangers posed by evil‐doers loose in the land unchecked by diviners whose powers had been shorn by colonial proclamation, an argument to which the administration remained unsympathetic.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
During colonial times women resorted to colonial courts for protection against the discriminatory justice of traditional chiefs' courts in matters of physical abuse, sexual abuse, and forced marriage.
“There is substantial evidence that during colonial times women resorted to colonial courts for protection against the discriminatory justice of traditional chiefs' courts in matters of physical abuse, sexual abuse, and forced marriage ( Booth 1992; Jean-Baptiste 2007 ) .”
From Legal Origins and Female HIV (2018) · cites this paper as Booth 1992
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- Kuper ,An African Aristocracy: Rank Among the Swazi( London , 1947 ), pp. 161n ; pp. 173 – 176
- Kuper ,African Aristocracy, pp. 165 – 166
- Kuper ,African Aristocracy, pp. 165 – 166
- Booth Alan R., 1990, Paper presented at the African Studies Association Conference, 25
- Kuper ,African Aristocracy, pp. 161 – 162
- Mann Kristin, 1991, Law in Colonial Africa
- Crush Jonathan, 1987, The Struggle for Swazi Labour, 1890–1920, 10.1515/9780773561182 · DOI
- Isaacman Allen, 1990, African Studies Review, 41
- Hilda Kuper ,The Uniform of Colour: A Study of White‐Black Relationships in Swaziland( Johannesburg , 1947 ), pp. 64 , 69
- Alice K. Armstrong ,Legal Aspects of Land Tenure in Swaziland( Mbabane , 1986 ), pp. 1 – 2
- Rubin N.N., 1965, Journal of African Law
- Fannin J.M.A., 1967, Principles of Swazi Customary Law
- Marwick ,The Swazi, pp. 124 – 25
- Kuper ,African Aristocracy, pp. 172 – 176
- Marwick Brian, The Swazi, 195
- Kuper ,The Swazi, pp. 71 – 76
- 10.2307/1158048 · DOI
- Crush ,Struggle for Swazi Labour, pp. 29 – 30
- Crush ,Struggle for Swazi Labour, pp. 29 – 30
- 10.1017/CBO9780511563027 · DOI
- Marwick ,The Swazi, pp. 205 , 211
- Pim A., 1932, Report on the Financial and Economic Situation of Swaziland
- Bonner ,Kings, Commoners and Concessionaries, pp. 26 , 51 , 85 , 105 , 160 – 162
- Native Affairs Department, Transvaal Colony, 1907, The Laws and Statutes of the Transvaal Specially Related to the Native Population of the Transvaal
- Booth , ‘Political Economy of Law’ , pp. 42 – 44
- Booth ,Swaziland, pp. 15 – 23
- 10.2307/218373 · DOI
- Crush ,Struggle for Swazi Labour, pp. 19 – 32 , 77 – 78 , 162 – 63 , 191 – 93 , 206 – 07
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Anderson, S. (2018) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20151047 · Cited by 101
Metadata
- Authors
- Booth, A. R.
- Affiliations
- Ohio University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Booth, Alan R.
- Venue
- Journal of Southern African Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1992-06
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 253-275
- ISSN
- 0305-7070 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-3893
- OpenAlex
- W2074245072
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Southern African Studies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › African history and culture studies
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Legal and cultural studies analysis
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › African Studies and Ethnography
- Keywords
- Swaziland, witchcraft, ritual specialists, legal protection of women, power redistribution, colonial justice, sexual abuse, forced marriage, British colonial rule, gender and law
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review