The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Identifying Science Understanding for Functional Scientific Literacy
Abstract
(2001). Identifying Science Understanding for Functional Scientific Literacy. Studies in Science Education: Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 1-44.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Misunderstood misunderstanding: social identities and public uptake of science
Wynne, B. (1992) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1088/0963-6625/1/3/004 · Cited by 1,675
Cited by
Feinstein, N. (2011) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.20414 · Cited by 459
Gormally, C., Brickman, P., & Lutz, M. (2012) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.12-03-0026 · Cited by 437
Reconceptualizing nature‐of‐science education in the age of social media
Höttecke, D., & Allchin, D. (2020) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.21575 · Cited by 303
The Public's Bounded Understanding of Science
Bromme, R., & Goldman, S. R. (2014) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2014.921572 · Cited by 282
Can science literacy help individuals identify misinformation in everyday life?
Sharon, A. J., & Baram‐Tsabari, A. (2020) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.21581 · Cited by 196
Metadata
- Authors
- Ryder, J.
- Venue
- Studies in Science Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2001-01
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-44
- ISSN
- 0305-7267 (ISSN-L)
- 1940-8412
- OpenAlex
- W2035351374
- Cited by
- 329
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 24.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identifying Science Understanding for Functional Scientific Literacy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/03057260108560166
- The paper
- Ryder, J. (2001). Identifying Science Understanding for Functional Scientific Literacy. Studies in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260108560166
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
