Silent pedagogy and rethinking classroom practice: structuring teaching through silence rather than talk
Abstract
Classroom observations are an important source of information about teaching and about the practice of particular teachers. The paper considers the value placed on talk as opposed to silence in this context and suggests that a cultural bias towards talk means that silence is commonly perceived negatively. The paper is based on a qualitative research study involving interviews with 25 teacher participants. These participants identify different types of silence and report how they use various silences in the classroom, suggesting that many different types of silence may be used productively in teaching and learning. The paper provides examples of questions that might be asked when observing teachers' uses of silence rather than talk. It concludes by proposing that classroom observations should take into account the complex skills of ‘silent pedagogy’ where the teacher makes conscious decisions to abstain from intervention based on continuous sensitive readings of the learning environment.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
According to Ollin, the notion of classroom participation should be revised to encompass silent thinking as something different from passivity.
“Thus, according to Ollin (2008) the notion of classroom participation should be revised to encompass silent thinking as something different from passivity.”
From How vocal and silent forms of participation in combination relate to student achievement (2023) · cites this paper as Ollin, 2008
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 47 · Cited by 110
- Authors
- Ollin, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Huddersfield (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Ollin, Ros
- Venue
- Cambridge Journal of Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-05-29
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 265-280
- ISSN
- 0305-764X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-3577
- OpenAlex
- W2081466437
- Cited by
- 110
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 7.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge Journal of Education (publishedVersion)
- University of Huddersfield Repository (University of Huddersfield) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Communication in Education and Healthcare
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Keywords
- classroom silence, classroom observation, teacher intervention, teacher beliefs, teaching practice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review